Table 3.
Test statistics comparing Repetition Positivity (RP) amplitudes across clinical outcome groups.
| C.I. (95%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | SE | DF | t or F Value | p-value | p-value, adjusted | Lower | Upper | |
| Group X Standard Position Omnibus | 2208 | (F) 1.74 | 0.0522 | - | - | - | ||
| Group X Standard position linear | 2208 | (F) 1.70 | 0.1648 | - | - | - | ||
| Group X Standard position quadratic* | 2208 | (F) 3.77 | 0.0103 | - | - | - | ||
| quadratic RP effect (within HC) | −0.0242 | 0.1696 | 2208 | −0.14 | 0.8868 | - | −0.3568 | 0.3084 |
| quadratic RP effect (within PRS-NC-R) | −0.0775 | 0.2716 | 2208 | −0.29 | 0.7754 | - | −0.6100 | 0.4551 |
| quadratic RP effect (within PRS-NC-S)* | −0.5363 | 0.2194 | 2208 | −2.44 | 0.0146 | - | −0.9666 | −0.1060 |
| quadratic RP effect (within PRS-C)* | −1.0849 | 0.3001 | 2208 | −3.62 | 0.0003 | - | −0.1673 | −0.4965 |
| quadratic RP effect HC vs. PRS-NC-R | 0.0533 | 0.3202 | 2208 | 0.17 | 0.8677 | 1.0000 | −0.5745 | 0.6812 |
| quadratic RP effect HC vs. PRS-NC-S | 0.5121 | 0.2773 | 2208 | 1.85 | 0.0649 | 0.3894 | −0.0317 | 1.0560 |
| quadratic RP effect HC vs. PRS-C* | 1.0608 | 0.3447 | 2208 | 3.08 | 0.0021 | 0.0126 | 0.3849 | 1.7367 |
| quadratic RP effect PRS-NC-R vs. PRS-NC-S | 0.4588 | 0.3491 | 2208 | 1.31 | 0.1889 | 1.0000 | −0.2259 | 1.1434 |
| quadratic RP effect PRS-NC-R vs. PRS-C | 1.0075 | 0.4047 | 2208 | 2.49 | 0.0129 | 0.0774 | 0.2138 | 1.8011 |
| quadratic RP effect PRS-NC-S vs. PRS-C | 0.5487 | 0.3717 | 2208 | 1.48 | 0.1401 | 0.8406 | −0.1803 | 1.2776 |
| Group Effect At Each Standard Position | ||||||||
| main effect of Group at s3* | 2208 | (F) 2.88 | 0.0349 | - | - | - | ||
| HC vs. PRS-NC-R | 0.1172 | 0.1178 | 2208 | 0.99 | 0.3200 | 0.7524 | −0.1138 | 0.3483 |
| HC vs. PRS-NC-S | 0.1366 | 0.1021 | 2208 | 1.34 | 0.1808 | 0.5383 | −0.0635 | 0.3367 |
| HC vs. PRS-C* | 0.3670 | 0.1268 | 2208 | 2.89 | 0.0038 | 0.0201 | 0.1183 | 0.6157 |
| PRS-NC-R vs. PRS-NC-S | 0.0194 | 0.1285 | 2208 | 0.15 | 0.8800 | 0.9988 | −0.2326 | 0.2713 |
| PRS-NC-R vs. PRS-C | 0.2498 | 0.1489 | 2208 | 1.68 | 0.0936 | 0.3359 | −0.0422 | 0.5419 |
| PRS-NC-S vs. PRS-C | 0.2304 | 0.1368 | 2208 | 1.68 | 0.0922 | 0.3321 | −0.0378 | 0.4987 |
| main effect of Group s4–5 | 2208 | (F) 0.30 | 0.8274 | - | - | - | ||
| main effect of Group s6–7 | 2208 | (F) 0.30 | 0.8271 | - | - | - | ||
| main effect of Group s8–10* | 2208 | (F) 2.73 | 0.0426 | - | - | - | ||
| HC vs. PRS-NC-R | 0.1872 | 0.1178 | 2208 | 1.59 | 0.1122 | 0.3851 | −0.0438 | 0.4183 |
| HC vs. PRS-NC-S | 0.1794 | 0.1021 | 2208 | 1.76 | 0.0789 | 0.2942 | −0.0208 | 0.3795 |
| HC vs. PRS-C* | 0.3266 | 0.1268 | 2208 | 2.58 | 0.0101 | 0.0494 | 0.0779 | 0.5754 |
| PRS-NC-R vs. PRS-NC-S | −0.0078 | 0.1285 | 2208 | −0.06 | 0.9514 | 0.9999 | −0.2598 | 0.2441 |
| PRS-NC-R vs. PRS-C | 0.1394 | 0.1489 | 2208 | 0.94 | 0.3493 | 0.7854 | −0.1526 | 0.4315 |
| PRS-NC-S vs. PRS-C | 0.1472 | 0.1368 | 2208 | 1.08 | 0.2818 | 0.7040 | −0.1210 | 0.4155 |
| main effect of Group s11+* | 2208 | (F) 5.79 | 0.0006 | - | - | - | ||
| HC vs. PRS-NC-R | 0.0535 | 0.1178 | 2208 | 0.45 | 0.6499 | 0.9689 | −0.1776 | 0.2845 |
| HC vs. PRS-NC-S* | 0.2686 | 0.1021 | 2208 | 2.63 | 0.0085 | 0.0424 | 0.0685 | 0.4688 |
| HC vs PRS-C* | 0.4722 | 0.1268 | 2208 | 3.72 | 0.0002 | 0.0012 | 0.2235 | 0.7209 |
| PRS-NC-R vs. PRS-NC-S | 0.2151 | 0.1285 | 2208 | 1.67 | 0.0942 | 0.1884 | −0.0368 | 0.4671 |
| PRS-NC-R vs. PRS-C* | 0.4187 | 0.1489 | 2208 | 2.81 | 0.0050 | 0.0256 | 0.1267 | 0.7108 |
| PRS-NC-S vs. PRS-C | 0.2036 | 0.1368 | 2208 | 1.49 | 0.1368 | 0.4448 | −0.0647 | 0.4718 |
*
p<.05; SE = standard error; DF = degrees of freedom; C.I. = confidence interval
p-value adjusted = Bonferroni-corrected (for polynomial contrasts) or Tukey HSD-corrected (for pairwise group comparisons within positions)