Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 27;117(32):19221–19227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919221117

Table 3.

Steady-state kinetic parameters for wild-type and mutant forms of Abl

Construct KDATP, μM KDPeptide, μM kcat, s−1 α Calc. KmATP @ 2 mM peptide, mM Calc. KmPeptide @ 2 mM ATP, mM
WT 69 ± 2 1,107 ± 57 19.0 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 0.2 97 ± 8 1,975 ± 236
F317L 76 ± 1 755 ± 11 25.6 ± 0.1 1.48 ± 0.02 100 ± 13 1,343 ± 176
G250E 47 ± 2 438 ± 43 24.0 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.3 96 ± 13 952 ± 157
Y253F 98 ± 5 1,164 ± 50 38 ± 2 1.4 ± 0.3 104 ± 14 1,617 ± 344

Measured and derived steady-state parameters. Shown are fits of activity assays with varying concentrations of both peptide substrate (0.25 to 2 mM) and ATP (25 μM to 2 mM) shown in Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Fig. S6. Data are fitted to the general velocity equation for a sequential random Bi–Bi reaction (see also SI Appendix, Eq. 1). This yields catalytic activity (kcat), binding affinity of ATP (KDATP), and binding affinity of peptide substrate (KDPeptide), as well as proportionality factor α. α quantifies the degree that binding of substrate one either increases (a < 1) or decreases (a > 1) affinity of the other substrate to the enzyme. These parameters can then be used to calculate the KmATP as well as KmPeptide at fixed concentrations of the other substrate (see also SI Appendix, Eqs. 2 and 3). Calc., calculated.