Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 4;98(8):skaa234. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa234

Table 4.

Experiment 1: effect of BSS and eCAN1 on enteric CH4 production of beef steers

Treatment2 P-value3
Item4 NCTRL U NIT UB NITB SEM NPN NS B B × N
CH4 emissions, g/d 121.16 117.27 115.57 134.09 100.04 10.986 0.673 0.039 0.951 0.121
CH4 emissions, g/kg OMI 15.35 15.42 16.44 15.59 13.67 1.197 0.954 0.689 0.264 0.209
CH4 emissions, g/kg OMD 28.72 28.63 30.33 29.36 25.70 2.246 0.921 0.649 0.372 0.222
CH4 emissions, g/kg MBW 1.51 1.39 1.44 1.55 1.18 0.126 0.341 0.051 0.689 0.063

2eCAN = encapsulated calcium-ammonium nitrate (5Ca(NO3)2-NH4NO3) – 65.1% nitrate DM basis.

2NCTRL, treatment 2.7 g/kg BW molasses; U, NCTRL + 182 mg/kg BW urea; NIT, NCTRL + 538 mg/kg BW eCAN; UB, treatment U + 58.4 mg/kg BW BSS; NITB, treatment NIT + 58.4 mg/kg BW BSS. Groups contained 10 (NCTRL), 8 (U, UB) and 7 (NIT, NITB) experimental units. Largest SEM is provided.

3Observed significance levels for: NPN, effect of NPN, NCTRL vs. the mean of U + NIT + UB + NITB; NS, effect of NPN source (excludes NCTRL); B, effect of BSS (excludes NCTRL); B×N, interaction of BSS and eCAN.

4CH4 was determined from the average of at least 3 out of 5 24 hr periods of breath sample collection. OM, OM intake; OMD, OM digested; MBW, BW0.75.