Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;48(1):282–286. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04999-1

Table 1.

Comparison of patients’ characteristics and imaging results between the presence (COVID+) and absence (COVID−) of a SARS-COV-2 infection

COVID+
(n = 11)
COVID−
(n = 11)
P value
18F-FDG PET indications 0.03*
Initial diagnosis or follow-up of a cancer 4 (36%) 10 (91%)
Suspicion of prosthesis infection, vasculitis, or endocarditis 4 (36%) 1 (9%)
Part of workups of macrophage activation syndrome or pericarditis 3 (28%)
Age (years) 72 ± 10 62 ± 15 0.09
Female gender 4 (36%) 2 (18%) 0.34
Body mass index (kg.m−2) 27.7 ± 5.8 23.3 ± 3.3 0.04*
Infectious symptoms 8 (73%) 8 (73%) 1.00
Delay from symptom onset (days) 12 ± 5 11 ± 6 0.80
C-Reactive Protein (mg.L−1)¥ 36.8 ± 37.8 133.6 ± 139.3 0.20
Extent of CT lung abnormality score 11.5 ± 8.0 6.7 ± 7.2 0.16
Presence of a GGO pattern by CT 8 (73%) 7 (64%) 0.65
Presence of a CPP pattern by CT 7 (64%) 7 (64%) 1.00
Presence of a CON pattern by CT 3 (27%) 7 (64%) 0.09
SUVmax of lung CT abnormalities 3.7 ± 1.9 6.9 ± 4.1 0.03*
SUVmax in areas with CON, GGO or CPP lesions (n = 20/n = 19) 3.0 ± 1.7 5.2 ± 3.8 0.03*
SUVmax in areas with CON lesions (n = 3/n = 7) 3.7 ± 2.1 8.6 ± 3.6 0.07
SUVmax in areas with GGO or CPP lesions (n = 17/n = 12) 2.9 ± 1.7 3.2 ± 2.2 0.67

*: p < 0.05 for the comparison between COVID+ and COVID− patients

¥C-Reactive Protein (mg.L−1): C-Reactive Protein only available for 12 patients (7 COVID+ and 5 COVID−)

BMI: Body mass index; CON: pattern of consolidation by CT; GGO: pattern of Ground Glass Opacity by CT; CPP: Crazy-Paving pattern by CT; SUVmax: maximal standardized uptake value