Table 3.
Hierarchical regression analysis in predicting depression at T2.
| Variables | B | SE | β | t | R square | Adjusted R square |
R square change |
F | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | .310 | .309 | .310 | 311.755 | .000 | ||||
| Depression_T1 | .559 | .023 | .552 | 24.722⁎⁎⁎ | |||||
| Quarantine_T1 | -.063 | .030 | -.047 | -2.096* | |||||
| Step 2 | .321 | .318 | .011 | 109.075 | .000 | ||||
| Depression_T1 | .556 | .022 | .549 | 24.733⁎⁎⁎ | |||||
| Quarantine_T1 | -.053 | .030 | -.040 | -1.779 | |||||
| Gender | .021 | .024 | .020 | .883 | |||||
| Age | -.004 | .002 | -.070 | -2.625⁎⁎ | |||||
| Education | .011 | .016 | .016 | .698 | |||||
| Monthly income | -.016 | .010 | -.043 | -1.587 | |||||
| Step 3 | .362 | .359 | .041 | 98.146 | .000 | ||||
| Depression_T1 | .572 | .022 | .565 | 26.121⁎⁎⁎ | |||||
| Quarantine_T1 | -.049 | .030 | -.036 | -1.624 | |||||
| Gender | .024 | .023 | .023 | 1.032 | |||||
| Age | -.003 | .002 | -.056 | -2.181⁎, ⁎⁎, ⁎⁎⁎ | |||||
| Education | .022 | .016 | .032 | 1.389 | |||||
| Monthly income | -.020 | .010 | -.054 | -2.042* | |||||
| Δ PSS10 | .200 | .022 | .194 | 8.945⁎⁎⁎ | |||||
| Quarantine_T2 | -.061 | .021 | -.063 | -2.853⁎⁎ |
Note: Δ PSS10 = Perceived stress at T2 minus perceived stress at T1.
p < .05;
p < .01;
p < .001.