Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;293:113396. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113396

Table 3.

Hierarchical regression analysis in predicting depression at T2.

Variables B SE β t R square Adjusted
R square
R square
change
F p
Step 1 .310 .309 .310 311.755 .000
Depression_T1 .559 .023 .552 24.722⁎⁎⁎
Quarantine_T1 -.063 .030 -.047 -2.096*
Step 2 .321 .318 .011 109.075 .000
Depression_T1 .556 .022 .549 24.733⁎⁎⁎
Quarantine_T1 -.053 .030 -.040 -1.779
Gender .021 .024 .020 .883
Age -.004 .002 -.070 -2.625⁎⁎
Education .011 .016 .016 .698
Monthly income -.016 .010 -.043 -1.587
Step 3 .362 .359 .041 98.146 .000
Depression_T1 .572 .022 .565 26.121⁎⁎⁎
Quarantine_T1 -.049 .030 -.036 -1.624
Gender .024 .023 .023 1.032
Age -.003 .002 -.056 -2.181, ⁎⁎, ⁎⁎⁎
Education .022 .016 .032 1.389
Monthly income -.020 .010 -.054 -2.042*
Δ PSS10 .200 .022 .194 8.945⁎⁎⁎
Quarantine_T2 -.061 .021 -.063 -2.853⁎⁎

Note: Δ PSS10 = Perceived stress at T2 minus perceived stress at T1.

p < .05;

⁎⁎

p < .01;

⁎⁎⁎

p < .001.