Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;293:113396. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113396

Table 5.

The parallel mediation model of positive and negative coping at T2 between perceived stress at T1and hostility at T2.

Predictors PC T2
NC T2
Hostility T2
β SE (HC3) t p β SE (HC3) t p β SE (HC3) t p
Gender .067 .030 2.448 .015 .055 .029 1.983 .048 -.105 .034 1.437 .151
Age .009 .002 .289 .773 .068 .002 2.162 .031 -.024 .002 -3.665 .000
Education .041 .021 1.376 .169 -.015 .019 -.542 .588 .074 .023 -.899 .369
Income .118 .013 3.729 .000 -.016 .013 -.439 .661 .036 .015 2.429 .015
PSS10 T1 -.167 .026 -5.967 .000 .169 .025 5.837 .000 .297 .030 11.344 .000
PC T2 -.161 .031 -6.471 .000
NC T2 .286 .035 1.769 .000
F (HC3) 12.444⁎⁎⁎ 8.353⁎⁎⁎ 51.258⁎⁎⁎
R .215 .185 .477
R2 .046 .034 .228

Note. PSS10 = Perceived stress; T1 = First survey; T2 = Second survey; NC T2 = Negative coping scores at T2; PC T2 = Positive coping scores at T2.