Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 14;30(9):5099–5109. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06785-x

Table 1.

Comparison of inflammatory parameters between inflamed and non-inflamed patients. ADC75, ADC90, etc. refer to the 75th and 90th percentiles of ADC measurements in the defined ROI. Estimates from each group are displayed as mean (95% CI). Odds ratio (OR) and p values (*) were derived from logistic regression. The highest ROC AUC value for the evaluation of inflammation is shown in italics. Sensitivity and specificity values for the optimal cutoff values (far right) are provided in the main “Results” section. The right-hand p values (**) relate to the comparison of ROC AUC with the median value

Inflammation
Present (n = 15) Absent (n = 38) OR (95% CI) *p= ROC AUC (95% CI) Optimal cutoff **p=
ADCmean 758 (629–887) 578 (535–621) 1.006 (1.001–1.011) 0.011 0.709 (0.530–0.888) 0.249
ADCmedian 747 (621–872) 577 (534–620) 1.006 (1.001–1.011) 0.016 0.695 (0.512–0.877)
ADC75 964 (813–1115) 733 (695–770) 1.008 (1.002–1.014) 0.011 0.763 (0.602–0.924) 0.073
ADC90 1172 (1007–1337) 882 (842–921) 1.010 (1.002–1.017) 0.007 0.819 (0.676–0.962) 986 0.072
PDFFmean 42.3 (37.2–47.4) % 43.9 (40.0–47.8) % 0.988 (0.934–1.041) 0.650 0.505 (0.329–0.682) 0.640
PDFFmedian 42.6 (37.8–47.6) % 44.3 (40.2–48.4) % 0.988 (0.937–1.040) 0.639 0.514 (0.337–0.691)
PDFF25 32.8 (27.5–38.1) % 37.1 (33.4–40.8) % 0.964 (0.910–1.021) 0.215 0.589 (0.414–0.763) 0.010
PDFF10 23.5 (17.8–29.2) % 30.3 (26.6–34.0) % 0.948 (0.895–1.004) 0.067 0.657 (0.485–0.829) 0.001