Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;10:13853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70734-3

Table 1.

Mean with upper and lower 95% confidence limits for agreement between measured LV mass and mass in mg estimated by various imaging modalities.

Method Author Upper 95% CI Mean Lower 95% CI
M-mode echocardiography Gardin33  − 11.0  − 47.7  − 84.5
Collins34 91.6 38.4  − 14.8
Kiatchoosakun35 38.9 13.1  − 12.7
Donner36 18.1 4.5  − 9.1
2D echocardiography Collins34 29 1  − 27
Kiatchoosakun35 35.3 10.2  − 14.9
Dawson8 6  − 10  − 36
3D echocardiography Dawson8 5.5 0.1  − 5.3
Magnetic resonance imaging Franco9 2.41  − 15.4 32.3
Ruff10 17.0 0.093  − 18.3
Dawson8 4.00  − 0.80  − 5.6
Micro-CT scan This study 3.10  − 0.09  − 3.29

Values for Gardin are calculated from tabulated data in their paper. Values for Franco and Ruff are measured from the figures provided in their papers.