TABLE 2.
RRBS protocol | Adapter contamination | Read loss after trimming | Reads length (bp) distribution after trimming |
Ovation method | Detected only in forward reads | 51% | < 50 34% |
50–99 40% | |||
100–150 26% | |||
Gel-free method | Detected in both reads | 8% | < 50 4% |
50–99 29% | |||
100–150 67% |
Paired-end reads from both methods were quality checked using fastQC software and trimming for Ovation libraries was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions. Read loss percentage was calculated as number of reads after trimming/number of reads before trimming. Bp, base pair.