Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;17(15):5436. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155436

Table 4.

Odds ratios of anticipated CMCP services (binary logistic regression).

Variables Personal Care Medical Care Psychological Consulting Health Examination Social and Recreational Activities Healthcare Education
Predisposing variables
Residence (ref. urban)
Town 1.94(1.49,2.54) ** 1.65(1.06,2.58) * 1.63(1.18,2.24) ** 2.35(1.05,5.26) * 2.04(1.54,2.70) ** 1.74(1.25,2.43) **
Rural 2.10(1.49,2.96) *** 2.30(1.59,3.31) *** 2.07(1.41,3.05) *** 3.78(2.27,5.30) ** 2.39(1.28,3.35) ** 2.16(1.44,3.26) **
Age (ref. 60~69)
70~79 1.79(1.42,2.53) * 1.69(1.22,2.13) ** 1.19(0.68,1.76) 1.54(1.13,2.50) * 1.14(0.75,1.69) 1.39(0.79,2.28)
≥80 2.31(1.58,3.29) *** 2.17(1.43,3.16) ** 1.66(1.16,2.48) * 2.18(1.78,3.68) ** 1.64(1.23,2.59) * 1.97(1.42,2.25) **
Education (ref. illiterate)
Primary 0.59(0.46,0.87) ** 0.38(0.13,0.95) ** 0.78(0.51,0.94) * 1.28(0.91,1.76) 0.63(0.43,0.89) ** 0.81(0.55,1.26)
Junior high school 0.91(0.65,1.24) 1.29(0.37,4.35) 1.19(0.82,1.75) 1.38(1.05,1.87) 0.95(0.74,1.37) 1.19(0.79,1.74)
Senior high school and above 1.84(1.12,2.24) ** 1.78(1.52,3.12) * 1.97(1.66,2.41) * 1.65(1.19,2.37) ** 1.82(1.58,2.12) ** 1.96(1.64,3.40) **
Enabling variables
Occupation (ref. farmer) 1.25(0.79,1.78) 1.27(0.81,1.79) 1.37(1.23,1.89) 1.31(0.94,1.76) 1.32(0.81,1.79) 1.18(0.82,1.78)
Number of children (ref. 0)
1 0.61(0.48,3.25) 0.72(0.28,3.65) 0.68(0.27,3.44) 0.59(0.31,0.75) * 0.76(0.38,3.57) 0.81(0.18,3.64)
≥2 1.47(0.33,1.78) 1.27(0.98,1.77) 1.24(0.59,1.74) 1.15(0.61,1.53) 1.46(0.58,1.67) 1.26(0.57,1.76)
Marital status (ref. married) 1.61(1.27,2.34) ** 1.54(1.25,2.24) ** 1.52(1.24,2.17) ** 1.69(1.45,2.31) * 2.24(1.56,2.84) ** 1.55(1.15,2.72) **
Economic status (ref. balance),
expenditures exceeded income 1.74(1.13,2.71) * 1.47(0.36,1.67) 1.61(1.10,2.77) * 1.19(0.78,1.75) 1.74(1.13,2.50) * 1.54(1.03,2.50) *
Income exceeded expenditures 2.38(1.98,3.98) ** 1.74(1.35,2.74) ** 2.24(1.82,3.94) ** 1.75(1.06,2.68) * 2.38(1.58,3.89) ** 2.38(1.78,3.87) **
Primary caregiver (ref. none)
Spouse 0.22(0.32,0.85) ** 0.88(0.71,0.95) * 0.57(0.39,0.81) ** 0.92(0.38,3.76) 0.52(0.32,0.96) ** 0.42(0.22,0.95) **
Children 1.37(0.47,4.25) 1.28(0.71,1.93) 1.56(0.53,4.94) 1.57(0.59,1.86) 1.57(0.47,4.34) 1.37(0.57,4.25)
Others 1.67(1.61,3.22) * 1.76(1.52,2.48) * 2.25(1.70,4.97) * 1.84(1.46,2.35) ** 1.67(1.41,3.13) * 1.67(1.31,3.42) *
Need variables
Self-rated health (ref. bad) 1.31(0.78,1.64) 1.39(0.23,1.90) 1.51(0.87,1.63) 1.37(0.23,1.85) 2.14(1.82,2.94) ** 1.41(0.27,1.81)
ADL (ref. completely independent)
Relatively independent 2.32(1.93,4.75) * 1.45(1.29,2.15) * 2.14(1.84,4.55) * 1.64(1.35,2.23) ** 2.25(1.15,5.26) * 2.14(1.84,4.75) *
Disability 3.59(2.32,5.32) ** 1.65(1.07,2.56) *** 3.59(2.42,5.41) ** 2.56(1.94,3.16) *** 3.68(2.27,5.20) * 3.65(3.16,4.22) ***
Model summary:
Nagelkerke R2 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18
χ2 with df = 45 (p-value) 126.35(<0.0001) 124.7(<0.0001) 91.28(<0.0001) 101.84(<0.0001) 91.52(0.0004) 83.95(0.0002)
−2Log likelihood 4781.27 1323.18 1659.72 18197.21 1678.63 1715.84

Note: *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. The table presents the final results when all sets of variables were entered at once, for the sake of presentational simplification.