Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 17;111(13):920–931. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1536

Table 3.

Stratified analysis for maternal daytime nap and sleep status during periconceptional period on risk of CHD in offspring

Poor sleep Daytime nap Simple CHD
Before propensity score analysis After propensity score analysis
Cases Controls Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) Propensity‐score‐adjusted Propensity‐score‐matched
Modela Modelb Cases Controls OR (95% CI) Cases Controls OR (95% CI)
No Yes 99 137 1 1 1 99 137 1 72 100 1
No 69 69 1.384 (0.907–2.111) 1.309 (0.830–2.064) 1.324 (0.836–2.097) 69 69 1.324 (0.848–2.068) 46 51 1.253 (0.759–2.067)
Yes Yes 33 26 1.756 (0.988– 3.122) 2.139 (1.158–3.952) * 2.236 (1.200–4.165) * 33 26 2.121 (1.156–3.892) * 21 15 1.944 (0.938–4.029)
No 61 30 2.814 (1.693–4.676) *** 3.049 (1.772–5.246) *** 3.183 (1.830–5.537) *** 61 30 2.968 (1.737–5.074) *** 48 21 3.175 (1.750–5.759) ***
Poor sleep Daytime nap Severe CHD
Before propensity score analysis After propensity score analysis
Cases Controls Crude OR (95%CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) Propensity‐score‐adjusted Propensity‐score‐matched
Modela Modelb Cases Controls OR (95% CI) Cases Controls OR (95% CI)
No Yes 96 137 1 1 1 96 137 1 70 95 1
No 83 69 1.717 (1.137–2.593) * 1.309 (0.839–2.041) 1.384 (0.893–2.144) 83 69 1.290 (0.830–2.004) 56 51 1.490 (0.914–2.430)
Yes Yes 36 26 1.976 (1.120–3.487) * 2.213 (1.179–4.091) * 2.263 (1.232–4.154) ** 36 26 2.140 (1.176–3.894) * 27 18 2.036 (1.040–3.985) *
No 47 30 2.236 (1.320–3.787) ** 2.110 (1.203–3.699) ** 2.184 (1.250–3.616) ** 47 30 2.086 (1.193–3.648) * 33 22 2.036 (1.093–3.790) *

CHD = congenital heart disease.

Modela: adjusted for maternal ethic, maternal age at delivery, maternal education, marital status, residence, maternal prepregnancy obesity, multiple births, infant gender, and family history of CHD.

Modelb: based on modela, further adjusted for prepegnancy diabetes/hypertension, folic acid use, and smoking/drinking.

*

p value <0.05

**

p value <0.01

***

p value <0.001