Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;21(15):5187. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155187

Table 1.

Central composite design arrangement and observed response.

Design Points Coded Independent Variables Response Values
X1 X2 X3 X4 EE (%) Size (nm)
1 −1 −1 −1 −1 23.6 135.2
2 1 −1 −1 −1 31.3 153.0
3 −1 1 −1 −1 65.3 183.5
4 1 1 −1 −1 65.6 170.1
5 −1 −1 1 −1 22.1 132.4
6 1 −1 1 −1 28.8 152.8
7 −1 1 1 −1 48.4 180.8
8 1 1 1 −1 30.0 138.9
9 −1 −1 −1 1 45.9 155.5
10 1 −1 −1 1 19.5 126.1
11 −1 1 −1 1 24.7 148.7
12 1 1 −1 1 21.9 179.6
13 −1 −1 1 1 44.3 143.6
14 1 −1 1 1 18.3 147.1
15 −1 1 1 1 43.6 147.8
16 1 1 1 1 43.0 130.8
17 −2 0 0 0 38.0 164.8
18 2 0 0 0 29.1 138.6
19 0 −2 0 0 19.2 134.8
20 0 2 0 0 44.3 157.5
21 0 0 −2 0 34.5 206.3
22 0 0 2 0 48.1 144.2
23 0 0 0 −2 21.2 172.7
24 0 0 0 2 25.9 127.0
25 0 0 0 0 19.5 142.9
26 0 0 0 0 23.6 119.6
27 0 0 0 0 14.9 122.5
28 0 0 0 0 19.6 124.8
29 0 0 0 0 24.8 127.0
30 0 0 0 0 26.7 133.1
31 0 0 0 0 28.1 129.7