Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 23;21(15):5222. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155222

Table 1.

Performance of lncRNA_Mdeep and other model architectures in the 10CV test.

ACC (%) Sn (%) Sp (%) MCC
OFH_DNN 95.74 ± 1.70 94.44 ± 4.89 97.04 ± 2.15 0.9171 ± 0.0307
k-mer_DNN 96.53 ± 0.41 96.40 ± 1.11 96.66 ± 0.78 0.9307 ± 0.0082
One-hot_CNN 95.82 ± 0.33 97.01 ± 0.96 94.63 ± 1.19 0.9169 ± 0.0064
OFH_DNN + k-mer_DNN 95.97 ± 2.49 96.87 ± 1.05 95.06 ± 5.71 0.9211 ± 0.0449
k-mer_DNN + One-hot_CNN 98.36 ± 0.16 98.70 ± 0.42 98.03 ± 0.50 0.9674 ± 0.0033
OFH_DNN + One-hot_CNN 97.60 ± 1.26 97.78 ± 1.58 97.43 ± 2.33 0.9526 ± 0.0248
Decision fusion 98.42 ± 1.12 99.24 ± 0.45 97.60 ± 2.59 0.9689 ± 0.0212
lncRNA_Mdeep 98.73 ± 0.41 98.95 ± 0.54 98.52 ± 0.92 0.9748 ± 0.0080

OFH_DNN, the DNN model with the OFH feature as input. k-mer_DNN: the DNN model with the k-mer feature as input. One-hot_CNN: the CNN model with one-hot encoding as input. ACC, accuracy. Sn, sensitivity. Sp, specificity. MCC, Matthew’s correlation coefficient.