Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 3;17(15):5586. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155586

Table 3.

Descriptive analysis and significance tests -ANOVA- of the attributes and the dimensions of CESQT for the two clusters found.

Descriptive Statistics Cluster 1 (n = 60%) Cluster 2 (n = 40%) Sig.
μ σ μ σ
Challenge work 2.50 1.11 2.22 0.81 0.363
Personal fulfillment 3.25 0.70 3.00 0.77 0.261
Positive things 3.00 1.09 2.33 1.03 0.044 *
Gratifying job 3.32 0.90 2.72 0.89 0.033 *
Excitement 2.50 1.43 1.94 1.00 0.157
Swamped 0.75 0.75 1.61 0.92 0.001 **
Overwhelmed 0.32 0.48 1.28 0.46 0.000 ***
Physical exhaustion 1.00 1.02 2.06 1.06 0.002 **
Emotional exhaustion 0.64 0.78 2.11 0.96 0.000 ***
Concern contact 0.43 0.63 1.17 0.71 0.001 **
Guilt-related attitudes 0.14 0.36 0.83 0.51 0.000 ***
Remorse 0.07 0.26 0.67 0.49 0.000 ***
Apologizing 0.36 0.49 1.00 0.69 0.001 **
Bad things said 0.29 0.53 0.78 0.65 0.007 **
Not answering 0.36 0.62 0.89 0.58 0.006 **
Insufferable 0.93 0.77 1.39 0.98 0.081
Mean 0.64 0.73 1.78 1.31 0.000 ***
Indifference 0.36 0.62 1.00 0.59 0.001 **
Irony 0.29 0.53 0.61 0.50 0.045 *
Labelling 0.93 1.05 1.33 1.03 0.206
Work excitement 2.91 0.64 2.44 0.62 0.017 *
Psychical exhaustion 0.68 0.54 1.76 0.66 0.000 ***
Guilt 0.26 0.30 0.89 0.35 0.000 ***
Indolence 0.58 0.40 1.17 0.54 0.000 ***
Burnout syndrome 1.11 0.29 1.57 0.35 0.000 ***

Source: own elaboration from research results. * 90% significance, ** 95% significance, *** 99% significance.