Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet HIV. 2020 Jul;7(7):e463–e471. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30108-9

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the intention-to-treat population (n=4,000)

Vitamin D3 (n=2,001) Placebo (n=1,999)

Sex
 Female 1367 (68%) 1368 (68%)
 Male 634 (32%) 631 (32%)
Age (years) 38.6 (9.8) 38.8 (10.0)
Education*
 No formal education 308 (15%) 327 (16%)
 Primary 1294 (64%) 1294 (65%)
 Secondary/ advanced 398 (20%) 377 (19%)
Body mass index (kg/m2)*
 <18.5 440 (22%) 404 (20%)
 18.5–24.9 1038 (52%) 1064 (53%)
 ≥25.0 521 (26%) 531 (27%)
CD4 T-cell count (cells per μL)
 < 200 866 (43%) 845 (42%)
 200–349 461 (23%) 445 (22%)
 350–499 300 (15%) 333 (17%)
 ≥ 500 284 (14%) 278 (14%)
 Missing 90 (5%) 98 (5%)
WHO HIV disease stage
 I / II 744 (37%) 760 (38%)
 III 1161 (58%) 1143 (57%)
 IV 96 (5%) 96 (5%)
Baseline pulmonary TB 189 (10%) 175 (9%)
Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) 35 (2%) 27 (1%)
ART regimen
 Efavirenz/lamivudine/tenofovir (EFV/3TC/TDF) 1940 (97%) 1943 (97%)
 Other ART regimen 61 (3%) 56 (3%)
Mean days from vitamin D screening to randomization 10.1 (8%) 10.2 (9%)
Vitamin D status at screening visit
 Insufficient, 25(OH)D 20.0–30.0 ng/mL 955 (48%) 972 (49%)
 Moderate deficiency, 25(OH)D 10.0–19.9 ng/mL 920 (46%) 865 (43%)
 Severe deficiency, 25(OH)D 0–9.9 ng/mL 126 (6%) 162 (8%)

Data are n (%), mean (SD).

*

Data not available for all randomized participants