Study	Reason for exclusion
Aaron 2016	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ self regulation and goal attainment intervention delivered over the phone
Andersen 2007	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement
Apter 2000	Design did not match inclusion criteria ‐ not a trial report
Apter 2015	Comparison did not match inclusion criteria ‐ telemedicine portal used with or without home visits (both groups used the portal)
Araujo 2012	Design did not match inclusion criteria ‐ cross‐over RCT
Baptist 2013	Comparison did not match inclusion criteria ‐ phone calls for asthma education vs non‐asthma education phone calls
Barbanel 2003	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma education intervention led by a pharmacist
Bender 2001	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ study assessing validity of self reports
Bender 2007	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ study assessing validity of self reports
Bender 2010	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement
Boyd 2014	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ pharmacist‐led intervention about adherence
Burbank 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ focus on asthma education, not on remote monitoring
Burkhart 2002	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ intervention to improve adherence to home PEF measurements
Bynum 2001	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ pharmacy‐led technology intervention to improve adherence
Chan 2007	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma reviews conducted remotely vs face‐to‐face
Chandler 1990	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ specifically monitoring theophylline levels
Chatkin 2006	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ phone calls to promote adherence, not monitoring
Chen 2013	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma behavioural intervention using technology, not monitoring
Cicutto 2009	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ not asthma monitoring with remote feedback
Clark 2007	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ counselling intervention, not asthma monitoring
Clarke 2014	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ parenting intervention, not asthma monitoring
Claus 2004	Design did not match inclusion criteria ‐ not an RCT
Cruz‐Correia 2007	Design did not match inclusion criteria ‐ cross‐over RCT
de Jongste 2008	Comparison did not match inclusion criteria ‐ comparing 2 types of electronic monitoring (FeNO vs symptoms)
De Vera 2014	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma education by a pharmacist, with some adherence monitoring
Dwinger 2013	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ coaching/education intervention using technology for multiple chronic conditions
Eakin 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ not asthma monitoring with remote feedback
Fonseca 2006	Design did not match inclusion criteria ‐ survey of RCT participants
Foster 2014	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ intervention to improve adherence, not monitoring
Friedman 1999	Design did not match inclusion criteria ‐ not an RCT report
Garbutt 2010	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma coaching/education intervention over the phone
Gruffydd‐Jones 2005	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma reviews conducted remotely vs face‐to‐face
Gustafson 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ self determination theory intervention, not remote monitoring
Halterman 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ multi‐faceted intervention, not just remote monitoring
Hashimoto 2011	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ steroid tapering remotely vs face‐to‐face
Huang 2013	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ support intervention, not remote monitoring
Janevic 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ management intervention for African American women
Jerant 2003	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ mixed diagnosis study comparing models for delivering home care
Kattan 2006	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement
Khan 2003	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ 1 phone call at discharge
Kojima 2005	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ not technology‐based
Lam 2011	Design did not match inclusion criteria ‐ cross‐sectional analysis of an ongoing RCT, and mixed diagnosis
Lobach 2013	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ not asthma monitoring with remote feedback
MacDonell 2015	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ focus on improving adherence, not on monitoring
McCowan 2001	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ computer‐aided decision support during consultation
McPherson 2006	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma education delivered via CD‐ROM and book vs book alone
Merchant 2016	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement. Although data could be made available to patients' healthcare providers, feedback was provided primarily automatically through the Propeller Health system and by study researchers
Morrison 2014	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement
Murphy 2001	Design did not match inclusion criteria ‐ comment on RCT
NCT00149474	Comparison did not match inclusion criteria ‐ 2 types of remote monitoring (PEF or symptoms)
NCT00562081	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ focus on asthma education, not on monitoring
NCT00910585	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ focus on asthma education, not on monitoring
NCT00964301	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ focus on asthma education, not on monitoring
NCT01117805	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ counselling intervention, not monitoring
Osman 1997	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ post‐admission follow‐up
Pedram 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ main focus of the study was to educate patients on how to use a peak flow meter
Peruccio 2005	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ treatment awareness education delivered over the phone, not monitoring
Petrie 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement
Pinnock 2003	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma reviews conducted remotely vs face‐to‐face
Pinnock 2007	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma reviews conducted remotely vs face‐to‐face
Price 2007	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ validating the Asthma Control Test for Internet use
Raat 2007	Design did not match inclusion criteria ‐ questionnaire, not RCT
Rand 2005	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ study measuring validity of self report
Rasmussen 2005	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma reviews conducted remotely vs face‐to‐face
Rikkers‐Mutsaerts 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement
Rosenzweig 2008	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ validation study
Schatz 2003	Comparison did not match inclusion criteria ‐ phone calls on top of face‐to‐face review
Schatz 2010	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ letter regarding validation of telephone delivery of the Asthma Control Questionnaire
Searing 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement
Seid 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma education and motivational interviewing, not remote monitoring
Shanovich 2009	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ focus on asthma education, not on remote monitoring
Sparrow 2005	Comparison did not match inclusion criteria ‐ phone monitoring with or without asthma education
Taitel 2014	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ pharmacy‐led compliance intervention, not remote monitoring
Uysal 2013	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ validating the Asthma Control Test via text messaging
van den Berg 2002	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ GP telephone access to paediatricians
van Gaalen 2012	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ multi‐faceted intervention, not just remote monitoring
van Reisen 2010	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ multi‐faceted intervention, not just remote monitoring
Vasbinder 2013	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement. Medication reminder system
Vollmer 2006	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement for most of the intervention group
Wiecha 2007	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ multi‐faceted intervention, not just remote monitoring
Yun 2013	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ asthma education via text
Zachgo 2002	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ computer works out best inhaler type for patient
Zairina 2015	Intervention did not match inclusion criteria ‐ minimal or no provider involvement. Although data could be made available to patients' healthcare providers, feedback was provided primarily automatically or by study researchers