Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003274

Table 6. Effect of the UBL intervention on IPV knowledge, attitudes, norms, household task division and decision-making, and HIV outcomes among men: ITT analysis.

Summary Statistics Intervention Effect
Control Group Couples' UBL Women's UBL Men's UBL Couples' UBL Women’s UBL Men's UBL
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) OR AOR* OR AOR* OR AOR*
Secondary HIV outcomes
Comprehensive knowledge on HIV 209/701 (29.8) 213/631 (33.8) 224/640 (35.0) 207/620 (33.4) 1.22 (0.82–1.80), p = 0.327 1.22 (0.83–1.79), p = 0.315 1.28 (0.82–1.97), p = 0.274 1.28 (0.85–1.94), p = 0.238 1.17 (0.82–1.67), p = 0.383 1.19 (0.86–1.66), p = 0.291
Condom use at last intercourse 17/697 (2.4) 29/629 (4.6) 19/636 (3.0) 9/617 (1.5) 1.92 (0.97–3.80), p = 0.061 1.80 (0.93–3.50), p = 0.082 1.22 (0.62–2.41), p = 0.565 1.20 (0.61–2.35), p = 0.600 0.59 (0.24–1.41), p = 0.231 0.60 (0.25–1.45), p = 0.253
Knowledge, attitudes, household decision-making, and task-sharing outcomes
IPV knowledge, attitudes, norms
Knowledge of IPV laws 409/701 (58.4) 391/631 (62.0) 403/640 (63.0) 402/620 (64.8) 1.17 (0.90–1.53), p = 0.250 1.15 (0.87–1.51), p = 0.336 1.22 (0.99–1.52), p = 0.064 1.21 (0.96–1.52), p = 0.099 1.32 (1.08–1.63), p = 0.007 1.36 (1.10–1.68), p = 0.005
Support for gender-equitable norms 304/701 (43.4) 333/631 (52.8) 290/640 (45.3) 314/620 (50.7) 1.49 (1.08–2.05), p = 0.015 1.47 (1.06–2.03), p = 0.021 1.10 (0.78–1.54), p = 0.589 1.10 (0.78–1.53), p = 0.594 1.36 (0.99–1.87), p = 0.060 1.38 (1.01–1.89), p = 0.040
Do not believe IPV is justified 373/701 (53.2) 349/631 (55.3) 345 (53.9) 349 (56.3) 1.09 (0.75–1.60), p = 0.642 1.09 (0.74–1.61), p = 0.658 1.04 (0.73–1.50), p = 0.818 1.04 (0.72–1.50), p = 0.853 1.14 (0.81–1.60), p = 0.447 1.14 (0.82–1.59), p = 0.443
Household decision-making and division of childcare and household tasks
Male involvement (household & childcare tasks) 135/1,463 (9.2) 247/1,270 (19.5) 143/1,236 (11.6) 222/1,246 (17.8) 2.44 (1.76–3.37), p = 0.000 2.52 (1.78–3.55), p < 0.001 1.30 (0.95–1.78), p = 0.104 1.29 (0.93–1.80), p = 0.137 2.18 (1.59–3.00), p < 0.001 2.37 (1.69–3.33), p < 0.001
Male dominance in decision-making (food & clothing) 743/1,456 (51.0) 568/1,268 (44.8) 594/1,232 (48.2) 552/1,244 (44.4) 0.77 (0.64–0.92), p = 0.005 0.73 (0.59–0.91), p = 0.006 0.89 (0.76–1.04), p = 0.152 0.92 (0.76–1.12), p = 0.404 0.76 (0.64–0.91), p = 0.002 0.70 (0.57–0.87), p = 0.001
Male dominance in decision-making (large item purchases) 951/1,455 (65.4) 686/1,268 (54.1) 727/1,226 (59.3) 676/1,241 (54.5) 0.62 (0.49–0.79), p = 0.000 0.61 (0.48–0.77), p = 0.000 0.77 (0.61–0.97), p = 0.028 0.76 (0.60–0.97), p = 0.027 0.63 (0.51–0.78), p < 0.001 0.61 (0.49–0.75), p < 0.001
Male dominance in decision-making (spending time with family/friends) 875/1,455 (60.1) 618/1,264 (48.9) 662/1,226 (54.0) 584/1,242 (47.0) 0.62 (0.46–0.83), p = 0.001 0.60 (0.45–0.81), p = 0.001 0.77 (0.58–1.04), p = 0.088 0.76 (0.57–1.02), p = 0.069 0.58 (0.46–0.75), p < 0.001 0.57 (0.45–0.72), p < 0.001
HIV knowledge, attitudes, behaviors
Confidence in ability to use a condom 291/701 (41.5) 408/631 (64.7) 287/640 (44.8) 330/620 (53.2) 2.65 (1.95–3.62), p < 0.001 [1.57 (1.40–1.73)] 2.76 (1.98–3.84), p < 0.001 [1.60 (1.41–1.76)] 1.14 (0.85–1.53), p = 0.391 1.13 (0.83–1.53), p = 0.443 1.61 (1.17–2.22), p = 0.004 1.74 (1.26–2.41), p = 0.001
Been tested for HIV 539/700 (77.0) 524/630 (83.2) 518/640 (80.9) 496/620 (80.0) 1.49 (1.02–2.16), p = 0.039 1.48 (1.04–2.11), p = 0.028 1.27 (0.90–1.78), p = 0.169 1.27 (0.91–1.78), p = 0.158 1.18 (0.81–1.73), p = 0.385 1.27 (0.88–1.82), p = 0.197
Discussed HIV risk with partner 479/701 (68.3) 519/631 (82.3) 487/640 (76.1) 475/620 (76.6) 2.14 (1.50–3.06), p < 0.001 2.14 (1.50–3.07), p < 0.001 1.47 (1.04–2.07), p = 0.027 1.46 (1.03–2.07), p = 0.031 1.50 (1.09–2.05), p = 0.012 1.65 (1.23–2.23), p = 0.001
Discussed sex with partner 513/701 (73.2) 531/631 (84.2) 500/640 (78.1) 512/620 (82.6) 1.96 (1.45–2.65), p < 0.001 1.92 (1.42–2.60), p < 0.001 1.32 (0.98–1.76), p = 0.067 1.28 (0.95–1.72), p = 0.102 1.75 (1.25–2.45), p = 0.001 1.90 (1.33–2.72), p < 0.001

Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted OR; IPV, intimate partner violence; ITT, intention to treat; OR, odds ratio; UBL, Unite for a Better Life.

*Adjusted for respondent’s age, respondent’s schooling category, marriage length, polygamous household, socioeconomic status, whether completed the full or short survey at endline, and number of months between end of intervention and endline interview.

Not assessed among spouses of baseline respondents in short endline questionnaire.

ORs adjusted to approximate the relative risk as per methodology of Zhang and Khai [28] when the outcome of interest is common (>10% in control group) and OR > 2.5 or OR < 0.5.