Table 1.
Statistical tests and results
| Figure | Type of test | Interaction/main effect | Statistical data |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1, 2 | Two-way ANOVA |
Sex × drug | F(5,88) = 3.045, p = 0.0140 |
| 1, 2 | Two-way ANOVA | Sex | F(1,88) = 10.55, p = 0.0016 |
| 1, 2 | Two-way ANOVA | Drug | F(5,88) = 12.21, p < 0.0001 |
| 1A1 | One-way ANOVA | F(3,30) = 5.98, p = 0.0025 | |
| 1A1 |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs 0.1 mg/kg; p = 0.0065 | |
| 1A1 |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs 1.0 mg/kg; p = 0.9997 | |
| 1A1 |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs 10 mg/kg; p = 0.9770 | |
| 1A1 |
Post hoc Tukey |
0.1 vs 1.0 mg/kg; p = 0.0203 | |
| 1A1 |
Post hoc Tukey |
0.1 vs 10 mg/kg; p = 0.0047 | |
| 1A1 |
Post hoc Tukey |
1.0 vs 10 mg/kg; p = 0.9680 | |
| 1A2 | One-way ANOVA | F(3,25) = 9.81, p = 0.0002 | |
| 1A2 |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs 0.1 mg/kg; p < 0.0001 | |
| 1A2 |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs 1.0 mg/kg; p = 0.0126 | |
| 1A2 |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs 10 mg/kg; p = 0.0402 | |
| 1A2 |
Post hoc Tukey |
0.1 vs 1.0 mg/kg; p = 0.4631 | |
| 1A2 |
Post hoc Tukey |
0.1 vs 10 mg/kg; p = 0.2245 | |
| 1A2 |
Post hoc Tukey |
1.0 vs 10 mg/kg; p = 0.9669 | |
| 1B1 | Unpaired t test |
Saline vs farnesene (males), p = 0.111 | |
| 1B2 | Unpaired t test |
Saline vs farnesene (females), p = 0.801 | |
| 2A | One-way ANOVA | F(2,23) = 8.506, p = 0.0017 | |
| 2A |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs nicotine; p = 0.0173 | |
| 2A |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs nicotine + farnesene; p = 0.0022 | |
| 2A |
Post hoc Tukey |
Nicotine vs nicotine + farnesene; p = 0.4280 | |
| 2B | One-way ANOVA | F(2,25) = 13.04, p = 0.0001 | |
| 2B |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs nicotine; p = 0.2916 | |
| 2B |
Post hoc Tukey |
Saline vs nicotine + farnesene; p = 0.0001 | |
| 2B |
Post hoc Tukey |
Nicotine vs nicotine + farnesene; p = 0.0041 | |
| 3C1 | Unpaired t test |
[α4, p = 0.2239], [α6, p = 0.9065], [α4α6, p = 0.6259] | |
| 3C2 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.1268 | |
| 3C3 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.1227 | |
| 3D1 | Unpaired t test |
[α4, p = 0.0515], [α6, p = 0.4842], [α4α6, p = 0.0653] | |
| 3D2 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.5572 | |
| 3D3 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.6156 | |
| 4A1 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.6343 | |
| 4A2 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.7225 | |
| 4B1 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.5285 | |
| 4B2 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.0480 | |
| 5B1 | Unpaired t test |
p < 0.0001 | |
| 5B2 | Unpaired t test |
p < 0.0001 | |
| 5D1 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.0149 | |
| 5D2 | Unpaired t test |
p < 0.0001 | |
| 7E1 | Unpaired t test |
p = 0.0002 | |
| 7E2 | Unpaired t test |
p < 0.0001 | |
| 8B | One-way ANOVA | F(2,12) = 23.05, p < 0.0001 | |
| 8B |
Post hoc Tukey |
5 μm farnesene vs 500 μm farnesene; p = 0.1823 | |
| 8B |
Post hoc Tukey |
5 μm farnesene vs 100 μm nicotine; p < 0.0001 | |
| 8B |
Post hoc Tukey |
500 μm farnesene vs 100 μm nicotine, p = 0.0031 | |
| 8E1 | Unpaired t test |
p < 0.0001 | |
| 8E2 | Unpaired t test |
p < 0.0001 |