Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;37(2):105–121. doi: 10.1177/1455072520904644

Table 3.

Factors explaining public opinion in relation to restrictive alcohol policy, OLS regression models.

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7
Social characteristics
 Gender: female = 1 +7*** +6*** +6*** +5**
 Age: young (< 30 years) = 1 –1 –2 –2 2
 Age: old (> 65) = 1 +1 +1 +0 +2
 Household income: high = 1 +2 +3 +4* +5**
 Household income: low = 1 –2 –3 –3 –4
 Education: high = 1 +7*** +9*** +7*** +5**
 “Class”: blue-collar home = 1 –1 –2 –2 –2
 “Class”: business owner/farmer = 1 –8** –7** –8** –4
 Geography: village, rural area =1 +1 +0 +1 –0
 Geography: city =1 +0 +1 +1 –1
 Nationality: grown up abroad = 1 –7** –11*** –7* –4
 Religiosity: prays to God, scale 0 (never)–1 (several times per week) +10*** +7** +5* +4*
Alcohol consumption
 Alcohol consumption frequency: scale 0 (never)–1 (several times per week) –11*** –15*** –8** –8**
 Alcohol consumption: abstainer = 1 +12*** +13*** +7** +6*
Knowledge, perception, experience
 Own experience of someone close drinking too much = 1 +2 +2 +1
 Knowledge about alcohol: index scale 0 (low)–1 (high) +18*** +15*** +10*
 Problem perception of alcohol consumption – in private life: scale 0–1 –13*** –9** –9***
 Problem perception of alcohol consumption – in society: scale 0–1 –33*** –30*** –18***
Ideology
 Left–right ideology: subjective scale 0 (left)– 1 (right) –13*** –14***
 Alcohol liberalism: scale 0 (restrictive)–1 (liberal) –38*** –30***
 Constant 58*** 67*** 71*** 87*** 61*** 64*** 84***
 Adj R 2 .05 .05 .14 .24 .11 .20 .34
N 1.588 1.601 1.230 1.452 1.579 1.198 1.141

Source: National Society, Opinion, Media survey, 2016.

Note. OLS = ordinary least squares. The dependent variable is an index of the mean value of two questions regarding the most important political instruments: “lowering taxes on alcohol” and “allowing strong beer, wine and spirits to be sold in grocery shops” (i.e., abolishing Systembolaget’s retail monopoly). The index is coded 0 (lowering taxes and abolishing the monopoly are both very bad proposals) to 100 (both very good proposals). All independent variables are coded 0–1 and presented in Table 1. Adj R 2-values are written in italics.

*p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001.