Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 19;162:31–50. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.08.011

Table 5.

Comparative evaluation for the PhysioNet dataset.

Study Method Average accuracy
(%)
Average
sensitivity
(%)
Average
specificity
(%)
This Study AEN 99.80 99.65 99.13

Ryu [70] CNN 79.5 70.8 88.2
Langley [113] Wavelet
 Entropy
77 98 56
Deperlioglu [120] Segmented CNN 97.21 94.78 99.65
Thomae [121] Deep Gated 
 RNN
55.0 99.0 11.0
Nilanon [122] CNN 81.35 73.5 89.2
Tschannen [123] Wavelet-
based
deep CNN
85.7 85.5 85.9
Yang [124] SVM 83 70 96
Puri [125] SVM 78.20 77.49 78.91
Potes [126] AdaBoost
 and CNN
81.91 77.81 86.02