Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 4;8(8):e15779. doi: 10.2196/15779

Table 3.

Results of meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessments for hemoglobin A1c levels, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure.

Outcomes Trials included Sample size SMDa (95% CI) P value I 2 Egger test Quality of evidence (GRADE)b






t value P value
HbA1cc levels 21 1671 −0.44 (−0.59 to −0.29) <.001 50 1.15 .26 Inline graphic Lowd,e
SBPf 16 1433 −0.17 (−0.31 to −0.03) .02 41 0.52 .61 Inline graphic Moderated
DBPg 14 1292 −0.17 (−0.30 to −0.03) .02 25 0.09 .93 Inline graphic Moderated

aSMD: standardized mean difference.

bGRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

cHbA1c: hemoglobin A1c.

dDowngraded by one level for indirectness (surrogate outcome).

eDowngraded by one level for inconsistency (moderate heterogeneity level, I2 = 50%).

fSBP: systolic blood pressure.

gDBP: diastolic blood pressure.