Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 4;27(12):2491–2498. doi: 10.1111/ene.14467

Table 2.

Reperfusion treatment characteristics of the sample before (pre‐COV) and after (COV) the setting of the state of emergency in Spain.

pre‐COV (n = 492) COV (n = 304) P
Reperfusion treatments per week, median (IQR) 46.5 (39.8–60.0) 39 (30.8–45.8) 0.043
IVT alone, n (%) 178 (36.2) 97 (31.9) 0.218
EVT, n (%) 314 (63.8) 207 (68.1) 0.218
IVT plus EVT, n (%) a 97 (30.9) 62 (30.0) 0.820
Anterior circulation, n (%) a 259 (88.4) 169 (89.9) 0.609
Tandem occlusion, n (%) a 46 (15.5) 27 (14.7) 0.797
General anaesthesia, n (%) a 175 (57.0) 81 (42.4) 0.002
First pass successful reperfusion, n (%) a 133 (58.3) 67 (55.4) 0.595
mTICI 2b–3, n (%) a 290 (92.9) 174 (86.6) 0.016

EVT, endovascular treatment; IQR, interquartile range; IVT, intravenous treatment; mTICI, modified treatment in cerebral infarction; rtPA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Bold font indicates statistical significance.

a

149 patients received bridging rtPA before EVT; bin EVT patients.