Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 21;38(1):e14380. doi: 10.1111/dme.14380

Table 3.

Associations between glucose measures, diagnosis of gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes

Study Population Total, n OGTT, n Design Outcome

Random plasma glucose

12 weeks

HbA1c

28 weeks

FPG

28 weeks

OGTT time 60

28 weeks

OGTT time 120

28 weeks

Diagnosis: receiver‐operating characteristic curves

AUROC (95% CI)

AUROC (95% CI)

AUROC (95%CI)

AUROC (95%CI)

AUROC (95%CI)

OPHELIA

Antenatal population with ≥1 GDM risk factor

361 361 Prospective NICE‐GDM No data 0.83 (0.75‐‐0.90)*** 0.75 (0.65‐0.85)*** no data 0.93 (0.86‐1.00)***
361 361 Prospective IADPSG‐GDM No data 0.84 (0.77‐‐0.91)*** 0.92 (0.85‐0.98)*** no data 0.83 (0.75‐0.92)***

Older CUHFT

Antenatal population with positive glucose challenge test 17736 3764 Retrospective NICE‐GDM 0.81 (0.79‐‐0.83)*** No data 0.69 (0.67‐0.71)*** 0.83 (0.82‐0.85)*** 0.99 (0.98‐0.99)***
17736 3764 Retrospective IADPSG‐GDM 0.81 (0.79‐‐0.83)*** No data 0.79 (0.77‐0.80)*** 0.93 (0.92‐0.94)*** 0.85 (0.84‐0.86)***

Diagnosis: unadjusted logistic regression

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

OR (95%CI)

Older CUHFT

Antenatal population with positive glucose challenge at 24 weeks 17736 3764 Retrospective NICE‐GDM 2.35 (2.24‐‐2.46)*** No data 4.84 (4.13‐5.67)*** 2.29 (2.16‐2.44)*** 348.82 (200.76‐606.07)***
17736 3764 Retrospective IADPSG‐GDM 2.45 (2.34‐‐2.57)*** No data 16.00 (12.98‐19.71)*** 5.76 (5.11‐6.49)*** 3.66 (3.35‐4.01)***

Recent CUHFT

Women with ≥1 GDM risk factor

according to the IADPSG criteria

826 826 Prospective NICE‐GDM No data n/a n/a no data n/a
826 826 Prospective IADPSG‐GDM No data

n/a

n/a

no data

n/a

Pregnancy outcomes: unadjusted logistic regression

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Older CUHFT

Antenatal population with positive glucose challenge at 24 weeks 17736 3764 Retrospective LGA infant 1.10 (1.06‐‐1.13)*** No data 1.87 (1.63‐2.14)*** 1.11 (1.06‐1.15)*** 1.04 (0.99‐1.10)
17736 3764 Retrospective CS 1.15 (1.21‐1.17)*** No data 1.48 (1.32‐1.67)*** 1.10 (1.06‐1.14)*** 1.11 (1.06‐1.15)***
17736 3764 Retrospective NH No data No data No data No data No data
17736 3764 Retrospective NICU 1.06 (1.02‐1.11)** No data 1.03 (0.82‐1.28) 1.02 (0.95‐1.10) 1.05 (0.97‐‐1.14)

Recent CUHFT

Women with ≥1 GDM risk factor

according to the IADPSG criteria

826 826 Prospective LGA infant no data 1.04 (1.00‐‐1.08)* 1.28 (1.01‐‐1.62)* No data 1.02 (0.92‐‐1.14)
826 826 Prospective CS no data 1.04 (1.01‐‐1.08)** 1.06 (0.88‐‐1.28) No data 1.04 (0.95‐‐1.13)
826 826 Prospective NH no data 1.05 (1.02‐‐1.08)** 0.95 (0.79‐‐1.15) No data 1.00 (0.92‐‐1.08)
826 826 Prospective NICU no data 1.02 (0.98‐‐1.06) 1.21 (0.94‐‐1.54) No data 0.93 (0.83‐‐1.04)

AUROC, area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve; CS, Caesarean section; CUHFT, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GDM, gestational diabetes; IADPSG, International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups; LGA, large‐for‐gestational‐age; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; NH, neonatal hypoglycaemia; NICU. neonatal intensive care unit; OR, odds ratio.

NH defined as neonatal glucose <2.6 mmol/l at least 4 h after birth. NICU admission defined as >24 h. OPHELIA included 361 women (8.3% with NICE‐defined GDM) all offered standard clinical management. Older CUHFT data included 4.3% of women (4.5% using current NICE GDM criteria) offered standard clinical management. The recent CUHFT data includes women with IADPSG‐defined GDM, all of whom were offered standard clinical management. ORs were calculated using continuous measures. *P < 0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001. Glucose >7.8 mmol/l, 1 h after a universal 50‐g glucose challenge at 24 weeks' gestation.