Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;12:73. doi: 10.1186/s13098-020-00580-w

Table 4.

Pre-treatment vs post-treatment comparison of clinical and biochemical parameters in T2DM patients with vitamin K2 supplementation

Variable Initial N = 12 Final N = 12 p value
Glucose (mg/dL) 130 ± 29 114 ± 35 0.002
HOMA-IR 4.1 ± 2.8 2.8 ± 1.9 0.041
%FPβc 514 ± 204 174 ± 104 0.002
SBP (mmHg) 132 ± 27 130 ± 18 0.695
DBP (mmHg) 81 ± 14 78 ± 8 0.116
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 197 ± 41 206 ± 34 0.239
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 180 ± 115 188 ± 79 0.814
VLDL (mg/dL) 36 ± 23 37 ± 15 0.814
uOC (ng/dlL 2.5 ± 1.6 2.3 ± 1.2 0.638
cOC (ng/dL 0.818 ± 0.567 1.2 ± 1.1 0.041
uOC/cOC index 4.3 ± 4.2 2.7 ± 1.9 0.182
Insulin (ng/dL) 108 ± 54 85 ± 43 0.117
Muscle (%) 46 ± 9 46 ± 10 0.657
Fat (%) 34 ± 9 34 ± 9 0.875
BMI (kg/m2) 28 ± 7 28 ± 7 1.000
Weight (kg) 76 ± 20 75 ± 20 1.000

HOMA-IR homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance, % FPβC percentage of functional pancreatic beta cells, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, VLDL very low density lipoprotein, uOC undercarboxylated osteocalcin, cOC carboxilated osteocalcin, BMI body mass index. Data presented in average and standard deviation. Statistically significant data are shown in italics type (p < 0.05)