Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;21:218. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01483-0

Table 3.

The comparison of the diagnostic accuracy for the likelihood prediction of PE among the Standard, the Age-adjusted, the YEARS, the PERC and the PEGeD algorithms for patients with AECOPD

Variables Standard Age-adjusted YEARS PERC PEGeD
TP-no. 210 165 150 207 186
FP-no. 948 246 222 933 183
FN-no. N/A 45 60 3 24
TN-no. N/A 702 726 15 765
Sensitivity -% N/A 78.6% 71.4% 98.6% 88.6%
Specificity -% N/A 74.1% 76.6% 1.6% 80.7%
PPV -% 18.1% 40.1% 40.3% 18.2% 50.4%
NPV -% N/A 94.0% 92.4% 83.3% 97.0%
PLR N/A 3.034 3.051 1.002 4.591
NLR N/A 0.289 0.373 0.875 0.141
YI N/A 0.527 0.480 0.002 0.693
DA -% N/A 74.9% 75.6% 19.2% 82.1%

TP True Positive, FP False Positive, FN False Negative, N/A Not Applicable, TN True Negative, PPV Positive Predictive Value, NPV Negative Predictive Value, PLR Positive Likelihood Ratio, NLR Negative Likelihood Ratio, YI Youden Index, DA Diagnostic Accuracy