Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;245(14):1233–1241. doi: 10.1177/1535370220929965

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Comparison of relative circFADS2 expression between the two stratifications of each clinic pathologic parameter (n = 200). (a) Comparison between the two age stratifications as ≥ 60 years and <60 years. (b) Comparison between the two gender stratifications as male and female. (c) Comparison between the two tumor size stratifications as ≥ 5 cm and < 5 cm. (d) Comparison between the two tumor differentiation stratifications as well/moderate and poor. (e) Comparison between the two tumor invasion depth stratifications as T1, T2 and T3, T4. (f) Comparison between the two lymph node metastasis stratifications as yes and no. (g) Comparison between the two distal metastasis stratifications as yes and no. (h) Comparison between the two TNM stratifications as I, II and III, IV. All experiments were performed in triplicates. GAPDH was used to normalize as reference gene. The data statistical significance is assessed by independent t-test. That P value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.