Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 19;2020(8):CD009716. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009716.pub2

Comparison 3. Dual versus one antiplatelet agent for preventing early recurrence after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Stroke 13 13637 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.71 [0.62, 0.80]
3.1.1 Aspirin + dipyridamole vs aspirin 5 977 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.38, 1.11]
3.1.2 Aspirin + dipyridamole vs clopidogrel 1 1360 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.27, 1.17]
3.1.3 Aspirin + clopidogrel vs aspirin 5 10739 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.63, 0.82]
3.1.4 Aspirin + clopidogrel vs clopidogrel 1 485 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.37, 1.97]
3.1.5 Aspirin + cilostazol vs aspirin 1 76 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.25 [0.03, 2.13]
3.2 Vascular death 10 12831 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.54, 1.30]
3.2.1 Aspirin + dipyridamole vs aspirin 4 868 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.65 [0.38, 1.11]
3.2.2 Aspirin + dipyridamole vs clopidogrel 1 1360 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Not estimable
3.2.3 Aspirin + clopidogrel vs aspirin 4 10527 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.37 [0.63, 2.98]
3.2.4 Aspirin + cilostazol vs aspirin 1 76 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Not estimable