Kilic 2011.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial Location of the trial: quote: Ankara, Turkey Method of randomisation: quote: "computer‐based randomized prospective analyses" Method of allocation concealment: not stated Source of funding: not stated | |
Participants |
Inclusion criteria: PCOS according to the menstrual, laboratory, and ultrasonographic criteria of Rotterdam 2003. (Menstrual criteria included oligo‐ or amenorrhoea, irregular cycle length, > 45 days or less than six periods a year, ultrasound criteria used for diagnosis). Patients with normal androgen levels (the normal range values for serum‐free testosterone in our laboratory <3.17 ng/mL) with non obese and obese women with PCOS were selected.
Exclusion criteria: for all participants included age less than 18 years or greater than 35 years, smoking, folic acid and vitamin B12 deficiency, pregnancy, hypothyroidism, hyperprolactinaemia, Cushing’s syndrome, nonclassical congenital adrenal hyperplasia (17 OHP <5 ng/dl) and current or previous (within the last 6 months) use of oral contraceptives, glucocorticoids, antiandrogens, ovulation induction
agents, antidiabetic and anti‐obesity drugs, or other hormonal drugs. Women with clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism alone were excluded from the study.
Number of women randomised: 105 MET: 54: 28 BMI ≥ 25 / 26 BMI < 25 OCP: 51: 26 BMI ≥ 25 / 25 BMI < 25 Number of women analysed: 96 MET: 47 OCP: 49 Number of withdrawal and reasons: MET: Loss of F/U: 5 / 9.3% Discontinu: 2 / 3.7% OCP: Discontinu: 2 / 3.9% Summary characteristics: PCOS, normoandrogenaemic and oligoamenorrhoeic with impaired glucose tolerance Age (years): MET mean (+ SD): BMI ≥ 25: Age (years): 28.7 (3.7) BM I< 25: Age (years): 26.3 (3) OCP mean (+ SD): BMI ≥ 25: Age (years): 29 (3.5) BMI < 25: Age (years): 26.7 (3.8) BMI (kg/m2): MET mean (+ SD): BMI ≥ 25 BMI (kg/m2): 31.5 (2.1) BMI < 25 BMI (kg/m2): 23,37 (1.64) OCP mean (+ SD): BMI ≥ 25 BMI (kg/m2): 27.7 (0.9) BM I< 25 BMI (kg/m2): 21.63 (1.47) |
|
Interventions | Treatment: MET 850 mg twice a day Control: OCP (Ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg desogestrel 0.15 mg) Duration: 6 months Co‐intervention(s): B‐groups vitamins vitamin B1.250 mg; vitamin B6.250 mg; vitamin B12.1000 mg, twice daily | |
Outcomes |
Primary outcomes: Adverse events: severe (requiring stopping of medication) and minor Secondary outcomes: BMI (kg/m2) |
|
Subjective outcomes | None | |
Objective outcomes | (a) Clinical parameters 1. Adverse events: severe (requiring stopping of medication) and minor 2. BMI (kg/m2) |
|
Notes | Power calculation: unclear | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: “computer‐based randomized prospective analyses”. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of allocation concealment not stated. Insufficient information available to permit a judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information available to permit a judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’. Blinding not stated. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information available to permit a judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’. Blinding not stated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | "Loss of F/U" or "discontinue treatment" unclear reason of withdrawal and could be related to intervention. Insufficient report of attrition/ exclusions to permit a judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’ |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Testosterone is not reported in the results. But not a primary or key outcomes. Insufficient information available to permit a judgment of 'low risk' or 'high risk'. |
Other bias | High risk | Baseline characteristic were not similar: BMI in metformin group higher than in OCP group in the subgroup BM I≥ 25kg/m2 MET mean (+ SD): 31.5 (2.1) / OCP mean (+SD): 27.7 (0.9) |