Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 13;2020(8):CD005552. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005552.pub3

Sahu 2018.

Study characteristics
Methods Randomised controlled trial
Location of the trial: quote: "Cuttack, India"Method of randomisation: quote: “random number table”Method of allocation concealment: not statedSource of funding: none
Participants Inclusion criteria:
Women diagnosed with PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria
Exclusion criteria:
Current or previous use of oral contraceptives, glucocorticoids, antiandrogens, ovulation induction agents, antidiabetic and anti‐obesity drugs or other hormonal drugs.
Medical or surgical treatment of PCOS during the previous 3 months
Presence of other endocrinopathies; except treated hypothyroidism on stable replacement doses of thyroid hormone
Pregnancy, breastfeeding or desire for pregnancy during study interval (6 months)
Inability to understand the proposal of the study precluding effective informed consent
Number of women randomised: 101
MET: 50
OCP: 51
Number of women analysed: 86
MET: 42
OCP: 44
Number of withdrawal and reasons:
MET: 8/ 16%
Discontinued drug: 2 / 4%
Lost F/U: 5/ 10%
Pregnancy: 1/ 2%
OCP: 7/ 13.7%
Discontinued drug: 2/ 3.9%
Lost F/U: 5/ 9.8%
Summary characteristics: PCOS, with menstrual irregularities, 18 and 35 years.
Age (years):
MET mean (+SD): 27 (5.2)
OCP mean (+SD): 26.8 (4.2)
BMI (kg/m2):
MET mean (+SD): 25.7 (2.6)
OCP mean (+SD): 25.6 (2.7)
Interventions Treatment: MET 500 mg twice a day/day
Control: OCP (Ethinyl Estradiol 35 mcg / Cyproterone acetate 2 mg) 21 days/ stop 7 days
Duration: 6 months
Co‐intervention(s): medroxyprogesterone acetate (5 mg/day) for 5 days was administered in order to induce vaginal bleeding.
All the patients were instructed to perform moderate physical activity and maintain a low carbohydrate diet throughout the trial.
Outcomes Primary outcomes: Hirsutism score
Adverse events: severe (requiring stopping of medication) and minorSecondary outcomes:
Menstrual cyclicity, initiation of menses or significant shortening of cycles
BMI (kg/m2)
Serum total testosterone (nmol/L)
Fasting insulin (mIU/L)
Fasting glucose (mmol/L)
Fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L)
Fasting HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)
Fasting LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)
Fasting triglycerides (mmol/L)
Subjective outcomes (a) Clinical parameters
1. Hirsutism score
Objective outcomes (a) Clinical parameters
1. Adverse events: severe (requiring stopping of medication) and minor
2. Menstrual cyclicity, initiation of menses or significant shortening of cycles
3. BMI (kg/m2)
(b) Hormonal parameters
1. Serum total testosterone (nmol/L)
(c) Metabolic parameters
1. Fasting insulin (mIU/L)
2. Fasting glucose (mmol/L)
3. Fasting total cholesterol (mmol/L)
4. Fasting HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)
5. Fasting LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)
6. Fasting triglycerides (mmol/L)
Notes Authors contacted about: to have the publication references.
Power calculation: unclear, a priori, on ovarian stromal PI.
Fasting insulin and total testosterone expressed in wrong unit in the article but with appropriate unit in the protocol.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: “random number table”.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not stated
Insufficient information available to permit a judgement of “low risk” or “high risk”.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Quote: "open‐label"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information available to permit a judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’.
Blinding not stated.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "Lost of follow up, discontinued drug" unclear reason of withdrawal.
Insufficient reporting of attrition/exclusions to permit a judgement of 'low risk' or 'high risk'.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The study protocol is available and it is clear that the published reports include all expected outcomes, including those that were prespecified.
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias.