Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;15(9):1678–1685. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.276341

Table 2.

Comparison of percentage of number and area of motor endplates between denervated interossei and denervated biceps in rats

Interossei Biceps


Denervated side Normal side Percentage Denervated side Normal side Percentage
Number of MEP 5 weeks 31.7 72.9 44.1* 34.0 57.3 58.0*
(27.7–33.0) (62.5–74.5) (41.7–45.9) (30.1–36.5) (54.5–59.9) (56.2–61.3)
7 weeks 20.3 72.1 29.1* 22.9 58.5 38.8*
(19.9–21.8) (68.5–74.8) (27.3–31.4) (21.7–24.4) (56.4–63.2) (36.7–40.4)
Area of MEP 5 weeks 25.7 84.9 29.7* 60.2 145 41.8*
(22.6–27.9) (77.5–93.8) (11.8–17.4) (56.9–65.9) (138.9–156.9) (38.8-43.5)
7 weeks 13.4 88.3 14.4* 40.3 156.6 27.1*
(11.5–14.1) (82.5–94.6) (13.2–16.4) (36.4–43.9) (147.5–174.1) (22.2–27.8)

Percentage: Divide the value on the denervated side by that of the normal side, and multiply by 100%. All data are expressed as median with interquartile range. Number of MEP: The average number of motor endplates per section that obtained from the average of the 5 sections chosen to be every 2 of the 10 sections. Area of MEP: The average area of one motor endplate that gained from the average of 50 motor endplates chosen equally and randomly from those five sections. *P < 0.01 (Percentage of number (or area) of MEP in interossei/biceps). MEP: Motor endplates.