Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;71:102188. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102188

Table A8.

How did lines impact the mode of future voting among 2012 in-person voters?

DV: Mode of Voting in 2014:
In-person Mail
Intercept −1.521***
(0.121)
−4.453***
(0.307)
2012 wait (hrs.) −0.044***
(0.008)
0.097***
(0.017)
Afr.-Am. −0.054***
(0.010)
−0.088**
(0.033)
Hispanic −0.318***
(0.011)
−0.383***
(0.033)
Other race −0.360***
(0.016)
−0.308***
(0.045)
2006 turnout 0.845***
(0.006)
0.758***
(0.019)
2008 turnout 0.012
(0.008)
−0.295***
(0.025)
2010 turnout 1.312***
(0.006)
1.107***
(0.021)
Age 0.014***
(0.0002)
0.041***
(0.001)
College educated 0.001***
(0.0001)
0.002***
(0.0002)
White pct. 0.014
(0.017)
0.005
(0.057)
Pop. Dens. (logged) −0.026***
(0.002)
−0.025***
(0.007)
Non-Eng. Speaking pct. −0.236***
(0.025)
−0.385***
(0.078)
Med. Inc. (logged) 0.061***
(0.008)
0.013
(0.027)

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Observations: 774,836.

Multinominial logit coefficients from one model reported.

DV reference category: Not voting in 2014.

State fixed effects included.