Table 1.
Comparison of learning and test performances between the original Mask RCNN and our approach
| Mask RCNN | Our approach | |
|---|---|---|
| Training | ||
| Classification | 0.9544 | 0.9915 |
| Detection | 0.9237 | 0.9826 |
| Segmentation | 0.8945 | 0.9630 |
| Test | ||
| Classification | 0.9219 | 0.9804 |
| Detection | 0.8603 | 0.9781 |
| Segmentation | 0.7966 | 0.9573 |
Bold numbers represent the best results