Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;10(3):359–367. doi: 10.1007/s13534-020-00168-3

Table 1.

Comparison of learning and test performances between the original Mask RCNN and our approach

Mask RCNN Our approach
Training
Classification 0.9544 0.9915
Detection 0.9237 0.9826
Segmentation 0.8945 0.9630
Test
Classification 0.9219 0.9804
Detection 0.8603 0.9781
Segmentation 0.7966 0.9573

Bold numbers represent the best results