Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 13;7:521. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00521

Table 3.

Precision tests for four commercial kits.

Run No. Ct values of target genes
Allplex PowerChek Real-Q StandardM
Positive control Negative control Positive control Negative control Positive control Negative control Positive control Negative control
E RdRp N E RdRp E RdRp E RdRp
Run 1 19.9 20.7 19.2 ND 22.9 23.8 ND 27.0 27.6 ND 26.1 24.3 ND
Run 2 20.4 20.3 19.5 ND 23.3 22.5 ND 27.1 27.8 ND 26.4 25.1 ND
Run 3 20.0 20.5 19.3 ND 23.0 22.3 ND 27.3 27.8 ND 26.1 24.8 ND
Run 4 19.8 20.0 18.5 ND 23.2 22.7 ND 27.2 27.9 ND 26.4 24.7 ND
Run 5 19.9 20.1 18.5 ND 23.0 21.7 ND 27.3 27.9 ND 25.9 24.3 ND
Mean 20.0 20.3a 19.0b ND 23.1 22.6a ND 27.2 27.8a ND 26.2 24.6a ND
SD 0.23 0.29 0.47 0.16 0.77 0.13 0.12 0.22 0.34
CV (%) 1.17 1.41 2.47c 0.71 3.4c 0.48 0.44c 0.83 1.39c

ND, not detected; SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation,

a

Comparison of Ct using the Mann Whitney U-test between E and RdRp showed significant difference in Real-Q (p = 0.008) and StandardM (p = 0.008),

b

Ct of N was shorter than E and RdRp in comparison using Kruskall Wallis test of three target genes of Allplex (p = 0.004),

c

Comparison of the CV using F-test between target genes within the kits showed that RdRp is bigger than E in PowerChek (p = 0.005).