Table 3.

Results of moderated mediation analysis on PSS and MTI.

	B	SE	t	p	R2
Model 1, DV: PSS F (5, 416) = 44.57***					0.35
Constant	−0.05	0.93	−0.06	0.95
SBPAa	1.58	0.26	6.03	0.00
Perf. rating	0.98	0.28	3.52	0.00
SBPA * perf. rating	−0.26	0.08	−3.27	0.00
Age	−0.00	0.00	−0.17	0.87
Genderb	0.08	0.13	0.60	0.55
Educational level	−0.03	0.08	−0.35	0.73
Model 2, DV: MTI F (4, 417) = 63.50***					0.38
Constant	1.10	0.35	3.18	0.00
SBPA	0.68	0.08	9.01	0.00
PSS	0.26	0.06	4.73	00
Age	−0.02	0.01	−3.73	00
Gender	−0.17	0.15	−1.15	0.25
Bootstrap results for conditional indirect effect of SBPA on PSS by perf. rating
	Effect	SE	LL 95% CI	UL 95% CI
Rating = 3	0.21	0.06	0.11	0.33
Rating = 4	0.14	0.04	0.07	0.23
Index of moderated mediation	Index	SE	LL 95% CI	UL 95% CI
	−0.07	0.03	−0.14	−0.01

N = 422.

^***Significant at 0.001 level. Bootstrap sample size = 5,000. DV, dependent variable.

^aStrengths-based performance appraisal.

^b0 = male, 1 = female. Results of analyses without the control variables age and gender were not substantially different.