Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Dec 28;26(5):884–892. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.763

Table 2.

Patient-, disease-, and transplant-related characteristics by GO total dose

n (%)* GO <10 mg
Total Dose
n = 30
GO ≥10 mg
Total Dose
n = 28
Patient-related
Age at transplant, median (range), years 41 (19–63) 47 (21–70)
Males 15 (50) 13 (46)
Karnofsky performance score
 90–100 16 (53) 15 (54)
 <90 13 (43) 13 (46)
 Not reported 1 (3) 0
HCT-CI
 0 13 (43) 9 (32)
 1–2 9 (30) 9 (32)
 ≥3 8 (27) 10 (36)
Hepatitis B and C serostatus pre-HCT
 B and C positive 0 1 (4)
 B positive 1 (3) 0
 B and C negative 28 (93) 26 (93)
 Not tested/inconclusive 1 (3) 1 (4)
Disease-related
Cytogenetics
 Favorable 1 (3) 2 (7)
 Intermediate 16 (53) 20 (71)
 Poor 13 (43) 6 (21)
Disease status
 First complete remission 12 (40) 8 (29)
 Second or greater complete remission 8 (27) 9 (32)
 Relapse/primary induction failure 10 (33) 11 (39)
Transplant-related
GO administration
 Single-agent GO 0 0
 GO plus chemotherapy 30 (100) 28 (100)
 Fractionated dosing 8 (27) 11 (39)
 Cycles of GO before HCT, median (range) 1 (1–3) 1 (1–3)
 Time from receiving GO transplant, median (range), months 4 (1–12) 3 (1–15)
Conditioning regimen
 Myeloablative–total body irradiation 9 (30) 9 (32)
 Myeloablative–chemotherapy 21 (70) 19 (68)
Pharmacokinetics for busulfan 7 (41) 10 (53)
Time from receiving GO to transplant, median (range), months
 First complete remission 4 (2–7) 3 (3–7)
 Second or greater complete remission 4 (2–9) 6 (2–15)
 Relapse/primary induction failure 4 (1–12) 2 (1–51)
Type of donor
 Related 11 (37) 12 (43)
 Unrelated 11 (37) 15 (54)
 Single cord blood 2 (7) 1 (4)
 Double cord blood 6 (20) 0
Donor-recipient CMV match
 Negative, negative 4 (13) 10 (36)
 Positive, negative 5 (17) 2 (7)
 Negative, positive 12 (40) 6 (21)
 Positive, positive 9 (30) 8 (29)
 Not reported 0 2 (7)
Donor age, median (range), years§ 33 (25–45) 28 (19–44)
Graft type
 Bone marrow 4 (13) 7 (25)
 Peripheral blood 18 (60) 20 (71)
 Umbilical cord blood 8 (27) 1 (4)
GVHD prophylaxis
 Tacrolimus-based 21 (70) 27 (96)
 Cyclosporine-based 8 (27) 1 (4)
 Other 1 (3) 0
Sirolimus usage 1 (3) 0
ATG/alemtuzumab
 ATG alone 7 (23) 5 (18)
 Alemtuzumab alone 1 (3) 0
 No ATG or alemtuzumab 22 (73) 23 (82)
Year of transplant
 2008 12 (40) .4 (50)
 2009 13 (43) 9 (32)
 2010 5 (17) 4 (14)
 2011 0 1 (4)
Follow-up of survivors, median (range), months 93 (49–98) 96 (56–121)
*

Unless otherwise noted.

Cytogenetic classification was defined as follows:

Favorable: inv(16), t(16;16), del(16q), t(15;17), [t(8;21) without del(9q) or complex].

Intermediate: normal karyotype, +8, +6, –y, del(12p), t(9;11), 11q23, MLL rearranged, and any other abnormalities not belonging to favorable or poor.

Poor: complex (≥3 abnormalities), –5/5q, –7/7q, abn 3q 9q 11q 21q 17p, t(6;9), t(9;22).

For busulfan-containing regimens only.

§

For unrelated donors only.

ATG indicates antithymocyte globulin; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GO, gemtuzumab ozogamicin; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation; HCT-CI, hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index; MLL, mixed lineage leukemia