Table 1.
Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis
Years | First author | Country | Type of study | Total number of patients | LC + LCBDE | LC + ERCP/EST | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of patients | Sex (male/female) | Age (years) | Number of patients | Sex (male/female) | Age (years) | |||||
1999 | Cuschieri et al.[4] | Scotland | RCT | 300 | 150 | 60/90 | 19-88 | 150 | 42/108 | 18-89 |
2002 | Sgourakis [5] | Greece | RCT | 78 | 36 | 15/21 | 43-88 | 42 | 17/25 | 46-89 |
2005 | Nathanson et al.[6] | Australia | RCT | 86 | 41 | 16/25 | 56.1 (17-91) | 45 | 17/28 | 53.6 (18-92) |
2009 | Noble et al.[7] | The UK | RCT | 91 | 44 | 16/28 | 75.9 (70-80.8) | 47 | 22/25 | 74.3 (70-78.9) |
2010 | Bansal et al.[8] | India | RCT | 30 | 15 | 4/11 | 47.1 (34-72) | 15 | 5/10 | 39.07 (23-64) |
2010 | Rogers et al.[9] | America | RCT | 112 | 57 | 17/40 | 39.9±1.9 | 55 | 16/39 | 44.6±1.9 |
2013 | Koc et al.[10] | Turkey | RCT | 111 | 57 | 20/37 | 51.5±16.6 | 54 | 18/36 | 54.9±17.9 |
2014 | Bansal et al.[11] | India | RCT | 168 | 84 | 23/61 | 45.1±15.1 | 84 | 34/50 | 43±13.7 |
2014 | Ding et al.[12] | China | RCT | 221 | 110 | 53/57 | 58.42±7.21 | 111 | 53/58 | 57.53±6.31 |
2016 | Barreras González et al.[13]> | Cuba | RCT | 88 | 43 | - | - | 45 | - | - |
2016 | Lv et al.[14] | China | RCT | 53 | 29 | 20/9 | 61.3±14.5 | 24 | 15/9 | 63.5±12.4 |
RCT: Randomized controlled trial, CBD: Common bile duct, LC: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, LCBDE: Laparoscopic CBD exploration, EST: Endoscopic sphincterotomy