Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Astrophys J. 2019 Jan 29;871(2):161. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf71f

Table 3.

Time Lags: Yusef-Zadeh et al. (2012) Flares

Flare Date Orig. Paper IR Facility X-Ray Facility YZ Time Lag (min) Our Time Lag (min)
A 2004 Jul 6/7 Eck+2006b VLT (K band) Chandra 71.2+1.3 1.21.6+7.6
B 2005 Jul 30 Eck+2008 VLT (K band) Chandra 810.1+10 4.211.3+8.2
C 2007 Apr 4 DE+2009 VLT (K band) Chandra 0.56.5+7 2.61.3+1.2
D 2007 Apr 4 YZ+2009 HST/NICMOS XXM-Newton 51.4+1 3.48.3+3.4
E 2007 Apr 4 YZ+2009 HST/NICMOS XXM-Newton 5.01.5+1.9 5.047.1+12.6
F 2008 May 5 YZ+2012 VLT (K band) Chandra 192.4+6.8 18.332.7+6.6
G 2008 Jul 26/27 YZ+2012 VLT (K band) Chandra 14.67.4+5.6 14.158.9+7.4

Note. Negative values mean X-ray leads IR. The first column labels the flares. The second column lists the date the simultaneous data were taken. Column three lists the original paper where the data were reported (Eck+2006b = Eckart et al. 2006a, Eck+2008 = Eckart et al. 2008, DE+2009 = Dodds-Eden et al. 2009, YZ +2009 = Yusef-Zadeh et al. 2009, YZ+2012 = Yusef-Zadeh et al. 2012 ). Columns four and five list the facilities with which the IR and X-ray data were collected. Column six lists the time lag and 1σ errors reported from the ZDCF analysis in Yusef-Zadeh et al. (2012). The last column lists the time lags and 68% confidence intervals we find from our Monte Carlo analysis (10,000 realizations).