Table 1.
Mixed effect model analysis on EGP and glucose disappearance
| EGP (μmol/kg FFM/min) | Rd (μmol/kg FFM/min) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EuLoI | EuHiI | HyLoI | EuLoI | EuHiI | HyLoI | |
| Exercise for participants without versus participants with type 1 diabetes | ||||||
| Estimated differences | −14.3 | 3.2 | −18.2 | 36.2 | 36.7 | 79.8 |
| 95% CI | (−21.0, −7.5) | (−3.0, −9.5) | (−24.5, −12.0) | (10.3, 62.1) | (12.9, 60.4) | (56.1, 103.6) |
| P value | 0.0001 | 0.30 | <0.0001 | 0.0067 | 0.0030 | <0.0001 |
| Pre-exercise versus exercise | ||||||
| Participants without diabetes | ||||||
| Estimated differences | −9.6 | −6.2 | −3.9 | −57.0 | −55.4 | −91.2 |
| 95% CI | (−14.6, −4.6) | (−11.2, −1.2) | (−8.9, 1.1) | (−77.0, −37.1) | (−75.3, −35.4) | (−111.1, −71.2) |
| P value | 0.0002 | 0.0149 | 0.123 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Participants with type 1 diabetes | ||||||
| Estimated differences | −19.2 | −2.5 | −9.0 | −40.2 | −70.4 | −42.3 |
| 95% CI | (−25.3, −13.1) | (−7.5, 2.5) | (−14.0, −4.0) | (−64.6, −15.7) | (−30.5, −5.0) | (−62.2, −22.3) |
| P value | <0.0001 | 0.33 | 0.0005 | 0.0015 | <0.0001 | 0.0001 |
| EuLoI versus EuHiI | EuLoI versus HyLoI | EUHiI versus HyLoI | EuLoI versus EuHiI | EuHiI versus HyLoI | EhHyI versus HyLoI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise | ||||||
| Participants without diabetes | ||||||
| Estimated differences | 3.8 | 9.7 | 5.9 | −37.4 | −65.1 | −27.8 |
| 95% CI | (−1.2, 8.8) | (4.7, 14.7) | (0.9, 10.9) | (−57.3, −17.4) | (−45.2, −6.5) | (−47.7, −7.8) |
| P value | 0.137 | 0.0002 | 0.0204 | 0.0003 | <0.0001 | 0.0068 |
| Participants with type 1 diabetes | ||||||
| Estimated differences | 21.3 | 5.8 | −15.6 | −36.9 | −21.5 | 15.4 |
| 95% CI | (15.7, 26.9) | (0.1, 11.4) | (−20.5, −10.6) | (−59.4, −14.4) | (−44.0, 1.0) | (−4.6, 35.3) |
| P value | <0.0001 | 0.0452 | <0.0001 | 0.0015 | 0.061 | 0.130 |