Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep;260:113167. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113167

Table 2.

Social contact and support descriptive statistics by cognitive impairment status.

All respondents
No impairment
Cognitive impairment
Mean (SD) or percent [IQR] Mean or percent Mean or percent
Named contacts 3.1 [2, 4] 3.2 2.0
Communication events per month 60.6 (38.3) [30, 90] 62.6 40.0
Contact kinship
 Named kin 2.4 [1, 3] 2.4 1.7
 Any named non-kin 35.5% 37.3% 17.3%
 Percent of named contacts who are kin 79.1% [67%, 100%] 78.5% 86.9%
Contact distance
 Same household 0.8 [0, 1] 0.8 0.7
 Same village 1.3 [0, 2] 1.3 0.8
 Agincourt area 0.4 [0, 0] 0.4 0.2
 Elsewhere South Africa 0.5 [0, 1] 0.5 0.2
Egonet effective size
 Effective size (range 1–5.7) 1.1 [1, 1] 1.1 1.1
Support types
 Informational, per month 29.3 (33.1) [4, 40] 30.4 17.8
 Emotional, per month 26.5 (32.8) [4, 35] 27.5 16.3
 Financial, per month 15.0 (22.2) [1, 30] 15.5 10.5
 Physical, per month 24.5 (26.1) [4, 34] 25.3 15.5

Note. IQR: Interquartile range; SD: Standard deviation. SD only given when used as a unit of analysis in subsequent regression analysis.