Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;11:4168. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17965-0

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate regression models of ICB and combination therapy response in PBRM1 mutated ccRCC patients in MSKCC cohort (n = 189).

Time-to-treatment failure Overall survival
Univariate analysis Multivariate model Univariate analysis Multivariate model
Variable HR (95% CI) P value HR 95% CI P value HR (95% CI) P value HR 95% CI P value
PBRM1 wild type 1 Ref. 1 Ref.
LOF 0.73 (0.5–1.07) 0.112 0.85 0.57, 1.28 0.44 1.5 (0.85–2.66) 0.161 1.24 0.69, 2.25 0.47
Non-LOF 1.05 (0.67–1.65) 0.838 1.22 0.77, 1.94 0.4 1.05 (0.46–2.4) 0.914 0.88 0.36, 2.14 0.78
TMB 0.94 (0.89–0.99) 0.029 0.96 0.90, 1.02 0.19 0.99 (0.9–1.08) 0.778
Age at treatment 1.29 (0–610.11) 0.936 1.31 (0–56668.63) 0.96
Genome doubled 1.08 (0.74–1.59) 0.695 1.56 (0.89–2.74) 0.115
Fraction CNA 1.46 (0.79–2.71) 0.227 2.04 (0.78–5.35) 0.144
CTLA-4 status 0.155 0.376
 No 1 1
 Yes 1.33 (0.9–1.99) 0.74 (0.38–1.44)
IMDC risk 0.211 <0.001
 1, 2 1 1
 3 1.35 (0.84–2.17) 3 (1.59–5.66) 4.22 2.18, 8.17 <0.001
Drug class 0.003 0.028
 IO 1 1 1
 IO–IO 1 (0.66–1.54) 1 0.54 (0.27–1.09)
 IO-VEGF 0.55 (0.38–0.8) 0.54 0.38, 0.76 <0.001 0.46 (0.24–0.87)
Line of therapy 0.211 <0.001
 >1 1 1 0.27 0.15, 0.49 <0.001
 1 0.81 (0.59–1.12) 0.34 (0.19–0.59)
BAP1 0.842 0.702
 No 1 1
 Yes 0.96 (0.64–1.44) 1.14 (0.59–2.21)
SETD2 0.48 0.71
 No 1 1
 Yes 0.88 (0.62–1.26) 0.9 (0.51–1.59)

P values derived from Cox proportional hazards model. For multivariate model IO and IO/IO were combined into one category. Multivariate model is based on 180 patients with available risk score.