Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;40(8):BSR20202509. doi: 10.1042/BSR20202509

Table 1. Clinical information from the eligible trials in the meta-analysis.

Included studies Tumor stage Patients Con/Exp Age (year) Control vs Experimental Intervening methods Dosage of Huaier granules Duration of treatments Parameter types
Chen QJ 2004 II-III 16/22 34–48 (range), 43 (median) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 1 month/course, 2 courses. ①, ③
Chen Y 2020 I-IV 50/50 61.42 ± 5.12 vs 61.50 ± 5.16 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 2 weeks for a course, 3 courses. ①, ③
Dai YG 2007 II-III 34/34 32–54 vs 29–55 (range) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 2-3 months
Guo FD 2014 Not provided 25/25 62.1 ± 1.8 vs 59.2 ± 2.3 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 1 month
Han SJ 2017 I-III 33/33 49.3 ± 2.1 vs 48.6 ± 2.3 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 weeks for a course, 3 courses. ②, ③, ⑤
Lei SS 2016 I-III 39/56 Not provided CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 1.5 years ④, ⑤
Liang YQ 2015 IV 50/48 35–69 vs 33–68 (range) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 6 months ②, ③, ⑤
Li ZH 2016 I-III 219/139 47.5 ± 9.1 vs 47.2 ± 8.8 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 5 months for a course, 2 courses.
Lu MQ2017 I-IV 45/45 49.8 ± 8.4 vs 48.5 ± 11.6 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 weeks for a course, 2 courses. ④,⑤
Lu Y 2009 I-IV 15/15 53.2 vs 51.7 (median) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 weeks for a course, 2 courses. ③, ④, ⑤
Qun SX 2020 Not provided 30/35 Not provided CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 2 years ④, ⑤
Ren XB 2018 I-III 42/42 54.83 ± 2.44 vs 54.12 ± 2.37 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 weeks ①, ②, ④
Shan CY 2018 I-III 46/46 53.54 ± 5.58 vs 53.48 ± 5.62 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 weeks for a course, 6 courses. ②,③
Tan ZD 2017 I-III 30/31 52.1 ± 5.7 vs 51.2 ± 6.1 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day Not provided ②, ③, ④
Tang Y 2006 I-III 25/25 Not provided CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 1 month
Wang MH 2019 I-III 100/101 Not provided CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 6-18 months
Wang W 2019 I-III 48/48 42.1 ± 4.5 vs 40.9 ± 4.0 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 6 months
Wu YB 2009 IV 28/24 41–74 (range), 49 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 months
Xiong Y 2015 I-III 42/50 19–65 vs 20–67 (range) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 weeks for a course, 6 courses. ②, ⑤
Xu F 2009 II-III 28/32 29–65 vs 27–64 (range) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day Not provided
Yang Z2017 I-II 30/30 55.3 ± 9.6 vs 54.9 ± 8.9 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 weeks for a course, 2 courses. ④, ⑤
Yin X 2013 Not provided 20/20 65 ± 1.5 vs 65.5 ± 1.5 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 1 month
Zhang JG 2014 I-III 32/32 27–70 vs 28–72 (range) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 6 months
Zhang Y 2019 Not provided 144/140 22–77 vs 24–80 (range) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 6 months
Zhao ZW 2020 III-IV 31/31 42.4 ± 1.6 vs 42.8 ± 1.3 (mean) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 weeks ①, ⑤
Zhong SW 2003 IV 33/29 41–74(range), 49 (median) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 3 months
Zhou P 2012 I-III 74/70 65–85 vs 65–79 (range) CT vs CT+Huaier granules (OA) 20g/time, 3 times /day 6 months ②, ③

Notes: Control group: conventional treatments alone group; Experimental group: Conventional treatments and Huaier Granule combined group. ①: Overall response rate and Disease control rate; ②: Overall survival or disease-free survival; ③: adverse events; ④: quality of life; ⑤: Immune function index.

Abbreviations: CT: conventional treatments; OA: Oral administration.