Table 6. Solution-state studies of 2a, 2b and 2h by 1H DOSY NMR using an ECCDSE in D8-THF and an ICC in 2-MeTHF to estimate their constitution and solvation in these donor solvents a .
| ||||
| D 8 -THF | MWdet [g mol–1] | V MWdiff [%] | IV MWdiff [%] | III MWdiff [%] |
| LiN(Me)Ph (2a) | 335 | –2 | –23 | 54 |
| LiN(H)Ph (2b) | 331 | –5 | –27 | 47 |
| LiNPh2 (2h) | 393 | <1 | –19 | 87 |
| 2-MeTHF | MWdet [g mol–1] | MWdiff [%] | MWdiff [%] | MWdiff [%] |
| LiN(Me)Ph (2a) | 363 | 2 | –21 | 57 |
| LiN(H)Ph (2b) | 393 | –9 | –31 | 38 |
| LiNPh2 (2h) | 451 | –4 | –23 | 54 |
aD8-THF: molecular weights derived from 1H DOSY-ECC-MW determinations at 15 nM concentrations in 0.5 mL D8-THF against tetramethylsilane (TMS) as a reference standard.27a 2-MeTHF: molecular weights derived from 1H DOSY-ICC-MW determinations at 0.2 M concentrations in 0.5 mL 2-MeTHF with 1,2,3,4-tetraphenylnaphthalene (TPhN), 1-phenylnaphthalene (1-PhN) and TMS as internal reference standards.29 See the ESI for full details.