Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;21:563. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03552-3

Table 2.

Results of the studies and factors excluded from the meta-analysis

Study Reason for exclusion of meta-analysis Results
Smeets et al. 2019 [42] Only study assessing knee abduction as a mean across the entire landing phase (kinematics) and not reporting sufficient statistics (kinetics) No difference in 3D knee abduction angle or peak knee abduction moment during a double-leg vertical drop jump between those who sustained an ACL injury (n = 4) and controls (n = 35), p > 0.05)
Numata et al. 2017 [40] Only study that reported peak MKD and MKD at initial contact Those who sustained an ACL injury (n = 27) had greater baseline MKD at IC (mean (sd), 2.1 (2.4) vs 0.4 (2.2) (p = 0.006) and greater peak MKD, 8.3 (4.3) vs 5.1 (4.1) (p = 0.007) compared to controls (n = 27) during a single-leg drop landing