Table 2.
Characteristics of retracted publications
| All retracted publications (n=136) | Retracted publications cited after retraction (n=84) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | (%) | n | (%) | |
| Reason for retraction | ||||
| Ethical misconduct | 80 | (58.8%) | 53 | (63.1%) |
| Scientific distortion | 37 | (27.2%) | 22 | (26.2%) |
| Unknown | 9 | (6.6%) | 5 | (6.0%) |
| Administrative error | 10 | (7.4%) | 4 | (4.8%) |
| Study design | ||||
| Observational | 35 | (25.7%) | 25 | (29.8%) |
| In vitro | 25 | (18.4%) | 19 | (22.6%) |
| Case report | 25 | (18.4%) | 13 | (15.5%) |
| Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) | 15 | (11.0%) | 12 | (14.3%) |
| Expert opinion | 20 | (14.7%) | 11 | (13.1%) |
| Animal study | 12 | (8.8%) | 4 | (4.8%) |
| Other | 3 | (2.2%) | 0 | (-) |
| Unknown | 1 | (0.7%) | 0 | (-) |