Table 2.
Observer performance study by Cole et al.[38] comparing single reading with and without CAD using two commercial CAD systems and 300 screening mammography cases (150 cancer and 150 benign or normal) from DMIST. None of the changes were statistically significant. AUC=area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. N=number of radiologists in the study.
CAD system A | CAD system B | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Standalone performance | 75% sensitivity at 0.79 FPs/image | 73% sensitivity at 0.77 FPs/image | ||
Radiologists | N=14 | N=15 | ||
Without CAD | With CAD | Without CAD | With CAD | |
Average AUC | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
Average sensitivity | 49% | 51% | 51% | 53% |
Average specificity | 89% | 87% | 87% | 86% |