Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1213:3–21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33128-3_1

Table 2.

Observer performance study by Cole et al.[38] comparing single reading with and without CAD using two commercial CAD systems and 300 screening mammography cases (150 cancer and 150 benign or normal) from DMIST. None of the changes were statistically significant. AUC=area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. N=number of radiologists in the study.

CAD system A CAD system B
Standalone performance 75% sensitivity at 0.79 FPs/image 73% sensitivity at 0.77 FPs/image
Radiologists N=14 N=15
Without CAD With CAD Without CAD With CAD
Average AUC 0.71 0.72 0.71 0.72
Average sensitivity 49% 51% 51% 53%
Average specificity 89% 87% 87% 86%