TABLE 3.
Counts and percentages of muscle food description factors of observational studies and randomized controlled trials from a systematic review and landscape analysis assessing muscle food categorization and descriptions in chronic disease literature
Observational studies | Randomized controlled trials | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Terminology in description | n | %1 | n | %2 |
Species | 404 | 63 | 112 | 86 |
Processing methods | ||||
“Smoking” or “smoked” terms | 38 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
Preservation by use of other ingredients3 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Degree of processing | ||||
“Fresh” or “frozen” terms | 56 | 9 | 12 | 9 |
“Unprocessed” term | 15 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
“Processed” term | 124 | 19 | 6 | 5 |
“Ground” or “minced” terms | 48 | 7 | 19 | 15 |
Leanness | ||||
“Lean” term | 24 | 4 | 25 | 19 |
Fat specification | 15 | 2. | 12 | 9 |
Muscle cut or product name | 337 | 52 | 53 | 41 |
Cookery method or “cooked” term | 35 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
Other terminology4 | 487 | 75 | 78 | 60 |
Percentage calculated as frequency of terminology used/646 descriptions from observational studies provided × 100.
Percentage calculated as frequency of terminology used/130 descriptions from randomized controlled trials provided × 100.
Includes chemical preservatives such as nitrates.
Other terminology includes specifying a local term, using “all” or “total” to describe muscle foods, or using “products” in the description.