Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 24;11(1):144–159. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz098

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the response of infant 25(OH)D to intervention or control doses of vitamin D for trials considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis1

Baseline Postsupplementation T1 Postsupplementation T2
 Reference  Total n randomized Dose (IU) n 25(OH)D (nmol/L) Infant age n 25(OH)D (nmol/L) Infant age n 25(OH)D (nmol/L) Infant age
Maternal vs. infant supplementation
Chandy et al. (33) 74 120,000/m NR 51 60.8 ± 29.0 3.5 mo N/A
78 Control 47 61.3 ± 25.2  N/A
Hollis et al. (34) 165 6400/d2 106 37.9 ± 23.3 4–6 wk 74 106.9 ± 35.1 4 mo 48 108.5 ± 38 7 mo
169 Control 110 33.7 ± 23.5 74 109 ± 48 47 109.1 ± 31.8
Rothberg et al. (35) 403 1000/d 403 22.2 ± 17.73 Birth 9 23.5 ± 5.2 6 wk N/A
500/d 9 25.5 ± 13.7  N/A
Placebo 10 2.7 ± 3.5  N/A
Control 12 37.9 ± 9.2  N/A
Infant bolus vs. daily supplementation
Huynh et al. (36) 34 50,000 29 33 ± 19.3 Within 48 h of birth 31 154 ± 65.3 10 d 26 65 ± 15.6 4 mo
36 Control 33 32 ± 13.6 31 48 ± 17.0 23 81 ± 9.8
Shakiba et al. (37) 30 50,000 every 2 mo NR 30 134.0 ± 48.7 4 mo N/A
45 Control 26 95.8 ± 28.5 N/A
1

Values are means ± SDs unless otherwise noted. Control is defined as infants receiving 400 IU/d. N/A, not applicable. NR, not reported; T1, first follow-up time point; T2, second follow-up time point; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

2

6400 IU/d provided as 6000 IU + 400 IU from prenatal supplement.

3

Baseline data not reported separately by group.