Table 2.
Comparison results of 10 TPOT models
| Model Index | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Kappa Score | Hamming Loss | AUC | Average Precision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.545455 | 0.785714 | 0.68 | 0.337748 | 0.32 | 0.792208 | 0.772134 |
| 2 | 0.545455 | 0.928571 | 0.76 | 0.493243 | 0.24 | 0.837662 | 0.850578 |
| 3 | 0.727273 | 0.857143 | 0.8 | 0.590164 | 0.2 | 0.896104 | 0.869712 |
| 4 | 0.727273 | 0.857143 | 0.8 | 0.590164 | 0.2 | 0.896104 | 0.899113 |
| 5 | 0.727273 | 0.857143 | 0.8 | 0.590164 | 0.2 | 0.850649 | 0.82549 |
| 6 | 0.636364 | 0.857143 | 0.76 | 0.503311 | 0.24 | 0.831169 | 0.83455 |
| 7# | 0.636364 | 0.928571 | 0.8 | 0.58194 | 0.2 | 0.902597 | 0.911364 |
| 8 | 0.636364 | 0.857143 | 0.76 | 0.503311 | 0.24 | 0.844156 | 0.824954 |
| 9 | 0.727273 | 0.571429 | 0.64 | 0.290221 | 0.36 | 0.753247 | 0.768781 |
| 10 | 0.545455 | 0.857143 | 0.72 | 0.414716 | 0.28 | 0.733766 | 0.764365 |
#Model 7 was selected as the final TPOT model in this study.