Table 2.
Significant FA, MD, AD, and RD Differences Between the SOC Groups and HCs
| Regions | SOC | HCs | t | P | Cohen’s d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | SS.R | 4.69E-01 (1.78E-02) | 4.88E-01 (2.62E-02) | −4.11 | .0001 | −0.93 |
| FX/ST.L | 4.43E-01 (2.04E-02) | 4.64E-01 (2.04E-02) | −4.09 | .0001 | −1.03 | |
| RD | SS.R | 6.16E-04 (2.32E-05) | 5.97E-04 (2.36E-05) | 3.76 | .0002 | 0.81 |
| FX/ST.L | 6.26E-04 (2.77E-05) | 5.95E-04 (2.84E-05) | 3.89 | .0002 | 1.11 |
Note: Bonferroni .05 corrected. AD, Axial Diffusivity; FA, Fractional Anisotropy; FX/ST, crescent of the fornix/stria terminalis; HCs, healthy controls; L, left; MD, Mean Diffusivity; R, right; RD, Radial Diffusivity; SOC, schizo-obsessive comorbidity; SS, sagittal stratum.