Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 23;11(2):327–348. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz111

TABLE 1.

Study quality assessment criteria and coding schema1

Criteria Unmet/unmentioned responses (score = 0) Partially met responses (score = 1) Completely met responses (score = 2)
A priori aim/hypothesis specific to food insecurity No mention of aim/hypothesis Implications of food insecurity in aim/hypothesis (i.e., hunger or difficulty affording food) Explicit mention of food insecurity in aim/hypothesis
Study population clearly specified and defined No mention of the population the sample is meant to represent Population partially and/broadly defined Population clearly defined
Rigorous participant recruitment Convenience sampling techniques N/A Random sample or census
Sufficient sample reporting No report of response rate or nonresponse bias evaluations Report response rate or nonresponse bias evaluations Report response rate and nonresponse bias evaluations
Reliable and valid measures of food insecurity Measures without psychometric testing Measures with limited testing or tested in different population Measures with psychometric testing in related population

1Criteria based on a scale used previously (43) and the Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (44). N/A, not applicable.